Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The author claims that government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve. In support of this, we can say there are many aspects in which this claim is true.For example, judge has to made his judgement rather than fawning of government, police officer has done his duty without influence of ministers. Thus, I support author's claim that government officers should stick to their decision without any influence.
First of all, to support my agreement to author's claim, I illustrate the biggest advantage of this statement. Because of this, there is more transparancy in the judgment of court. Thus, public's faith in court increase and they never fear to file case against any powerful man's sin. Moreover, this claim takes care of laws. So, we can say that it is very important for goverment official to make judgement without doing any kind of flattery to thier senior.
Because of this, they also boost their ability to give good judgment. Some people give judgment on what is apperantly right or wrong? This can improve public's fedility in law and order. For example, one police officer punishs realtive of his senior for his crimes. This reduces culprit's dauntlessness to do further crimes. Hence, this can buttrest equality of each and every people.
Although, it also has some negative effects on the society. For example, one become fearless to make his decision without knowing that it is right or wrong. It might bring injustice to innocent people and they have suffered for the sins that they have not done. So, it also has negative effect, officials have to sure about judgement. All aspects have positive as well as negative effect, we have considered effect whichy is more important than other to imply.
In conclusion, I just want to say that author's claim has its valid points and should have to instuct all the officials to imply it. This statement can further extend by impling influence of only courts' judgment. So, we have to imply it throughout country to improve relationship between public and government.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-15 | Raian Islam | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | Harsha98 | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | shiki | 66 | view |
| 2019-07-24 | Gh.Ne | 66 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | isaackoshy | 33 | view |
- To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to addre 54
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of marketing at Dura-Sock, Inc."A recent study of our customers suggests that our company is wasting the money it spends on its patented Endure manufacturing process, which ensures that our socks ar 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and support 58
- Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns 50
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to add 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...any aspects in which this claim is true.For example, judge has to made his judgemen...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t equality of each and every people. Although, it also has some negative effects on t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 311, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tionship between public and government.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'moreover', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'as to', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'kind of', 'as well as', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.220812182741 0.240241500013 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.175126903553 0.157235817809 111% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0659898477157 0.0880659088768 75% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0532994923858 0.0497285424764 107% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0736040609137 0.0444667217837 166% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.126903553299 0.12292977631 103% => OK
Participles: 0.0203045685279 0.0406280797675 50% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.52343740005 2.79330140395 90% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0456852791878 0.030933414821 148% => OK
Particles: 0.00253807106599 0.0016655270985 152% => OK
Determiners: 0.0659898477157 0.0997080785238 66% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0253807106599 0.0249443105267 102% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00507614213198 0.0148568991511 34% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2113.0 2732.02544248 77% => OK
No of words: 352.0 452.878318584 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.00284090909 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.58838876751 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.369318181818 0.366273622748 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.289772727273 0.280924506359 103% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.176136363636 0.200843997647 88% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0994318181818 0.132149295362 75% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52343740005 2.79330140395 90% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 219.290929204 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53125 0.48968727796 108% => OK
Word variations: 57.2389921299 55.4138127331 103% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6194690265 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.380412469 68% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8920166389 59.4972553346 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0454545455 141.124799967 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 23.380412469 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.636363636364 0.674092028746 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 44.9772727273 51.4728631049 87% => OK
Elegance: 1.21848739496 1.64882698954 74% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302247317894 0.391690518653 77% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0903199889585 0.123202303941 73% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0796270114596 0.077325440228 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.473157821783 0.547984918172 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.118520158253 0.149214159877 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102528869344 0.161403998019 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116334224916 0.0892212321368 130% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.297979368476 0.385218514788 77% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0887981219179 0.0692045440612 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19328503604 0.275328986314 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0957296940449 0.0653680567796 146% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.