Government's should focus on solving immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problem's in the future
Government's face problem's on day to day basis and some of them might have high priority while some low priority to solve. Problem's related to basic need's like food, shelter, education, job's and many more should be solved on urgent basis to improve country's economic, political and education stability. It totally depends on the country what problem need to be solve and how to solve. Some problem's are related to immediate threat to the country which need to be solved on urgent basis without taking it's severity in to consideration.
First is the example of Government of United States Of America, one of the most important and richest economy in the world. The problem's like equality among citizen's, job's infrastructure, developing an ideal country and many more are being addressed way long in 18th and 19th century. Now, they are willing to solve the problem's that might be faced in future like extracting or mining minerals from planet where it is in abundant amount. To keep the mother earth a habitable place without exploiting the green earth.
Second is the example of Government of Niger, the one of the poorest country in the world. The country is in facing problem's like poverty, lack of education, economy, job's infrastructure and many more. The Government must solve these problem's first if they want to address the anticipated problem's of future. Because solving future problem's need huge amount of wealth along with smart brains, and even sometimes infrastructure for experimental purpose.
Third is the example of Government of Democratic Republic of North Korea, country which is being ruled by only one family from the independence of country. The country is rigorously working in developing itself into a nuclear state in order to safe guard it's citizen's from foreign threat and spending billion's and billion's of dollar's on it. Instead, they would have used it in improving country's economy, lifestyle or standard of citizen's, making country advanced in technology but the canard of the country is unwilling to do so.
I totally do agree with the given statement that government's should focus on the immediate problem's but it is not valid in every countries case. It totally depends on country's leadership to address problem, and it can vary as soon as the leadership changes. If a country is having infrastructure, smart brains and capital then they can address any problem any how.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-19 | wopona8219 | 50 | view |
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively 54
- In any situation progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view 50
- Some people claim that the goal of politics should be the pursuit of an ideal Others argue that the goal should be finding common ground and reaching reasonable consensus 50
- Claim Major Policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts Reason Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better and perspective than do members of general public 66
- Some people believe that universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Others believe that universities should not force to take any courses other than those that will help prepare them for job 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, then, third, while, even so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2010.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 398.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05025125628 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71957273421 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507537688442 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4547787651 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 111.666666667 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.05555555556 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286569129722 0.243740707755 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104326837407 0.0831039109588 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0905579564478 0.0758088955206 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173686695374 0.150359130593 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0966689791901 0.0667264976115 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.