Government should invest as much money in the arts they do in military

Essay topics:

Government should invest as much money in the arts they do in military.

The author contends that government should spend as much money in arts as it spends for military. Art are the defining characteristics for a nation. Art plays a vital information regarding a tradition in a society. Art forms like dance, music, and painting are indispensable part of the society. I concede this statement art has the potential reform for any country economy. Beyond this comparison I find speaker’s assertion indefensible from both an empirical and a normative standpoint.

The main point for my disagreement with author’s assertion is that in today’s world military plays an vital need in current scenario because each nation wants to conquer the other nation. The reason behind their conquering nation is justifiable or unjustifiable. For example, nowadays all country are fighting against terrorism, for this fight we need highly trained military action as well as high equipment’s. And for this we need to government should invest more money on military than on arts.
Another example I would like to give is that we need to have trade relation with different nations in terms of military arms. All nations should have well equipped new technology military armed equipment’s that would help them to fight for their nation and for civilian’s safety. For Example China has more focused and invested more money for their military, they have use new technology and built new and modernized equipment’s for their Nation’s safety. For this trade relation Nation should invest more money on military trade rather than arts.

Another reason behind my disapproval is that whenever there is a legislature meeting in assembly, the primary focus is for civilian safety instead of other things. For example the most powerful nation USA spends millions of dollars for their citizen’s safety. Not only USA other countries should give their first priority to civilian safety by supporting more and more on military rather than on arts.
Finally people argue that arts are the weapon for employment in a country so it requires government support. But the reality is that art works are not dependable on the government money. Moreover art can independently because the root of art lies deep in culture instead of any kind of support.

I would like to conclude that government should more focus on Military rather than arts because the primary need for the nation is paramount of military. Art can sustain individually with their existence of culture while the government needs to focus on the people’s safety in shorts the military needs and military trades.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-05-30 HAN YEBIN 50 view
2024-05-16 HAN YEBIN 50 view
2024-05-09 batterylow_123 66 view
2024-05-09 batterylow_123 30 view
2024-04-18 Zahid6400 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user chandrika123 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
... in arts as it spends for military. Art are the defining characteristics for a nati...
^^^
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ion regarding a tradition in a society. Art forms like dance, music, and painting a...
^^^
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...is that in today’s world military plays an vital need in current scenario because ...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
... more on military rather than on arts. Finally people argue that arts are the weapon f...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 187, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...not dependable on the government money. Moreover art can independently because the root ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, moreover, regarding, so, well, while, for example, in short, kind of, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2177.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 417.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2206235012 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78522485111 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458033573141 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 675.9 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.98625797 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.9545454545 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9545454545 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77272727273 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278991724918 0.243740707755 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103262980384 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0947997512784 0.0758088955206 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163542051788 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618380971851 0.0667264976115 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.