Governments officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reason

Essay topics:

Governments officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

Controlling a governing a country has always been a controversial issue. While some people maintain that officials should rely on their own judgment, some may claim that they should consider about people's ideas. I strongly believe officials should work based on their ideas and I will explain my view now.

Firstly, officials in different parts of the government have a number of consultants that help them to make a error prof decisions. For example, for dealing an oil contract in my country, Iran, there are various consultants ranging from oil experts to international law experts. These people survey the contract from various point of views and try to present a perfect one. Official, based on the gathered information, could decide to deal with appropriate company while individuals may do not have these opportunity and their ideas would be fallacious to some extent.

Furthermore, due to advanced in technology and specially in communication, there are numerous types of social media and people could say their ideas freely ranging from tweeter and facebook to online TV and online newspapers. Thus, officials may face with a huge amount of different ideas for a special issue while they do not have enough time to consider all of them and it may distract them from the main jobs.

On the other hand, some may claim that aforementioned process lead to dictatorship and destroy the country. I believe in a democratic country, there are various methods to prevent dictatorship such as parliament and different survey organization. Moreover, these officials persons are temporary and have been chosen by individuals for a period. After finishing the period, if people would not satisfy by their performance other ggroup can take the power by voting process.

In conclusion, although there are some worries about leading to dictatorship in rely on officials judgement, nevertheless, advocates fails to provide cogent evidence to prove that. I strongly believe officials should work according to their ideas due to expers and consultant that they have.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-01-03 jenas 83 view
2023-10-23 Zaima 66 view
2023-10-23 Zaima 83 view
2023-10-23 Zaima 66 view
2023-10-23 fstamim 83 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user ali.rs :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...r of consultants that help them to make a error prof decisions. For example, for ...
^
Line 3, column 500, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this opportunity' or 'these opportunities'?
Suggestion: this opportunity; these opportunities
...mpany while individuals may do not have these opportunity and their ideas would be fallacious to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 89, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'officials'' or 'official's'?
Suggestion: officials'; official's
...bout leading to dictatorship in rely on officials judgement, nevertheless, advocates fail...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, while, as for, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my view, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 330.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2696969697 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87246674436 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542424242424 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1756116994 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.933333333 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 5.21951772744 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154324577624 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544766086442 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556215670952 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0973933937117 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732830656917 0.0667264976115 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.