Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
With ever-increasing student loan debt in the United States and the resulting economic malfunctioning coupled with the recent spike in the unemployment, makes the tuition waiver, a promising solution to the students who cannot afford quality education that tantamount to the fees it seeks. The prompt suggests that the government should offer free university education to the powerless. In my opinion, though the idea of free education is effective and even provides a practical future for the country and the economy, it is important to understand the system in which the idea operates. For the same, I would like to discuss two different scenarios and the idea of how free education can have a definitive success.
To begin with, the idea of free education is not entirely a new concept, in my country, India, the idea of free education to the underprivileged has been practiced for the past half-century. In Tamilnadu, in the 1960s during the Kamaraj rule, there were even more initiatives to call for students from pastoral backgrounds to pursue education. For instance "Mid-day meal" scheme which offers lunch to students who cannot even afford a proper meal had pulled a fair amount of young people to Learning spaces which hoped to create a solid platform for the future of Tamilnadu and it did. Many of the leading scientists and administrators of India were once benefitted by such free education. Dr Abdul Kalam, the late president and a visionary of space and missile of India was one student who had free education. This initiative has created huge personalities and role models which is what I believe a catalyst to the future generation.
Fast-forwarding to the 20th century and looking at the global scale of knowledge and resources intertwined with the population and the expansion of territories, India is struggling to keep up with the modern world and still providing the equality in education. The Indian start of technology is one of the largest institutions that give quality education, the institution holds the state of the art technologies which need to update to the stream of fast-moving technology costing millions of dollars to keep up with modern science. Equating that with the free education coupled with the steady increase in the value of resources has created a huge burden on the government and that led to stringent competitive exams and raising the question of who was underprivileged which in my opinion, not the right question to ask.
Thus, the idea of free education is more practical to the future of our human civilization and hence the Earth thyself but it is no doubt that giving free education is a huge burden to the system i.e., the government and thus unlike India which controls the intake via strict reforms to keep the quality, it would be ideal if the burden was shared. Many Philanthropists and Non-Governmental organizations can help the government to share its burden. Provided that these organizations and standard fees to those who could afford can share and support the idea of the government's policy to provide free education, Rather than pushing the government in reducing the quantity of intake to keep the quality of education.
To close, the government standalone cannot take this huge responsibility of providing free education to those who cannot afford but it is practical for the different organizations and non-governmental systems to make this happen. After all, the government is, of and by the people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-30 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Moustafa Noufale | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Moustafa Noufale | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Moustafa Noufale | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | Dhruv_gre | 54 | view |
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants."Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. Only about 2 percent of customers have c 16
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants."Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. Only about 2 percent of customers have c 16
- Fifteen years ago Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors Since that time Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes and overall student 67
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 383, Rule ID: STATE_OF_THE_ART[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state-of-the-art'?
Suggestion: state-of-the-art
...ty education, the institution holds the state of the art technologies which need to update to th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 567, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...d can share and support the idea of the governments policy to provide free education, Rathe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, look, so, still, thus, after all, for instance, no doubt, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 86.0 58.6224719101 147% => OK
Nominalization: 35.0 12.9106741573 271% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2933.0 2235.4752809 131% => OK
No of words: 572.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12762237762 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89045207381 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03557071959 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466783216783 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 926.1 704.065955056 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.4406901064 60.3974514979 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.944444444 118.986275619 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.7777777778 23.4991977007 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25491585894 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844712515152 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637633736051 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155067557651 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635171947896 0.0667264976115 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 14.1392134831 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 48.8420337079 82% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 100.480337079 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.