Governments should place few if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Things are evolving these days, and it is important to know the level of a positive or negative impact it might have. Further study and research about the past and present help one to make predictions about the future. The prompt recommends that gaining more knowledge and horizon about the evolving of things should have a little bit of limitation. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with this suggestion and argue that the information helps us to gain insight about how to handle things and predict the best approach to solving problems for three reasons.
To begin, the past is the key to the present, having an insight about past information helps in predicting future occurrences and analysis. For instance, renowned polar researcher Alfred Wegener came up with the theory that the continents were once together until there was a continental drift. He was able to come up with this theory as a result of research and based on the information he gathered such as the appearance of some extinct animals fossil in different parts of the continent. This information helped him prove his theory. The above example illustrates how scientific research helped Alfred Wegener help enlighten the world that there was a continental drift and based on this information people discovered the movement of tectonic plates that could cause a continental drift to happen, perhaps if he had not brought this information to light the existence of tectonic plates might still be undiscovered.
Further, research shows that most companies make use of scientific research and approach to determine the progress and growth of the company. For instance, these companies analyze their pat data and research on ways to improve themselves. They make use of certain new developments such as the use of Python language to analyze their data. Python language was probably developed by someone who had gone through series of research and figured out that creating a software that could help companies with big data set analyze their data with ease is of great essence. We need to acknowledge that information is key and to get these information one has to go deep into trying to gather more knowledge about things not known.
Of course, some argue that there are some information that are better left undisclosed but perhaps these information helps us to understand things much better and make the unknown known.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-19 | Celestina Asantewaa | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 75 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
| 2024-03-02 | LauraTing | 79 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 325, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ut the evolving of things should have a little bit of limitation. In my opinion, I strongl...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 440, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
... such as the appearance of some extinct animals fossil in different parts of the contin...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 623, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...edge that information is key and to get these information one has to go deep into trying to gathe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, as to, for instance, of course, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2007.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 395.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08101265823 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67927054 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511392405063 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.3821081041 60.3974514979 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.8 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.086093479229 0.243740707755 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0329078622029 0.0831039109588 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0247742026016 0.0758088955206 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.048169810129 0.150359130593 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322341134588 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 325, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ut the evolving of things should have a little bit of limitation. In my opinion, I strongl...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 440, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
... such as the appearance of some extinct animals fossil in different parts of the contin...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 623, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...edge that information is key and to get these information one has to go deep into trying to gathe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, as to, for instance, of course, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2007.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 395.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08101265823 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67927054 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511392405063 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.3821081041 60.3974514979 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.8 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.086093479229 0.243740707755 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0329078622029 0.0831039109588 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0247742026016 0.0758088955206 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.048169810129 0.150359130593 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322341134588 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.