Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
According to author all the governments should place minimal restrictions on scientific research and development. I agree to some extent to this, but on certain conditions. The assumptions it makes is that the restrictions are purely beauraucratic in nature, which might not always be the case. Consider for example, the restrictions imposed on experimenting untested medicines on humans, sure opposing side might say that this is necessary for progression of science, but there is a set need of guidelines and regulations which the some body has to established. In this case, where the medicines are tested on animals and they do not show any side effects. Even then, the individuals should be closely monitored.
Apart from that corporations might indulge in idiosyncracies which do not have any "scientific need". Take for example the drug oxycotin, it was claimed to be non-addictive and was according them needed for pain management. It had devastating impacts on some individuals who were over-prescribed the drug and hence got addicted to them. Without the intervention of the government to put some restrictions on the company, it would have thrived even more. It also validated that restrictions are also placed in to make sure that other companies do not use the some malpractices.
However, that is not to say that goverment restrictions are always good. Consider this scenario where the government put restrictions on researching nuclear energy, because it thinks it to be dangerous. The scientific community would stronly oppose such an idea as within "certain conditions", one can research on nuclear energy and think how it can lead to better quality of life for human beings. Consider the case during cold war, scientists of USSR and USA were not able to collaborate on scientific research, due to restrictions imposed by both of their government. One could imagine that if they were working together, they could share their knowledge and expertise in variety of scientific domains like Space technologies, Nuclear energy, Computer science and engineering, etc. After the fall of soviet union, they did work on some domains like in space, where they built the International space station together and on Computer science and engineering but imagine if they had started collaborating decades ago. One could not imagine to think that even Chernobyl could have been avoided if USA would have share some of it's Nuclear powerplant technologies, which it uses to ensure safety.
In other cases, during the late 19th century, a highly passionate and intelligent student was not admitted to any university in Poland, as they had restrictions on not allowing any women to contribute in the field of science and technology. The student was none other than Marie Curie, imagine such idiotic restrictions which do not have any scientific or logical backing, ones which are purely beauracratic in naturea.Restrictions which do not have scientific and congency supported on them, should not be put into place. There is a set of regulations needed to maintain prosperity in scientific research and development to main order and avoid chaos. At the same time, should not get overwhelming where it hinders innovation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-19 | Celestina Asantewaa | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 75 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
| 2024-03-02 | LauraTing | 79 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a local newspaper Commuters complain that increased rush hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time The favored proposal of the motorists lobby 58
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 534, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...of guidelines and regulations which the some body has to established. In this case, ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 534, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'somebody'?
Suggestion: somebody
...of guidelines and regulations which the some body has to established. In this case, where...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 569, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...ure that other companies do not use the some malpractices. However, that is not ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1044, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'imagine thinking'.
Suggestion: imagine thinking
...ollaborating decades ago. One could not imagine to think that even Chernobyl could have been avo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 420, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Restrictions
...hich are purely beauracratic in naturea.Restrictions which do not have scientific and congen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, then, apart from, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2731.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 515.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30291262136 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18056474265 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.499029126214 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 867.6 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.667897235 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.136363636 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4090909091 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22727272727 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195814426966 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601829806101 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457271321505 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132848307825 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490245075601 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.