Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Scientific research and development are one of the most effective investments of time and money. Over the course of history, research in science and development has only proven to benefit the human kind and also many other living species. Restriction of breakthroughs in science is only going to reduce the quality of life. In fact, the government should be funding adequate resources to this field.
Science has been a huge reason for the development of our life and the way we live. From just a wheel shaped stone to now automated vehicles, from wearing minimal clothing to wearing designer and comfortable cloths. It has given us the solution to life threatening diseases and complex mathematical calculations. Science is the epitome of human development and is around us in every single way and molecule. Putting a limit to this could degrade the improvements in our life and keep us in a constant loop of unknowingness. What is beyond us? The answer can only be found through lots of research and effort.
That said, scientific upgrades can be a big issue to deal with and has to be carefully handled and use to utmost effect. Therefore, putting such valuable learnings in unknown or wrong hands could be drastic. One of the most tragic and deadly events that ever took place is the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This event is the evidence that developments of higher values could be misused to the worst extent. The United States did not fully contemplate the effect of the bombing and acted upon shear rage which ended up in a gruesome way. The 2 cities still suffer with the effects until today.
In addition to that, the mid-western countries like Iran and Iraq still pose the threat of accumulation of nuclear weapons. As it is observed over the years, even though nuclear science has benefitted the human race, its has also paved way to destruction.
Many other instances of the negative impact of scientific research and developments have been witnessed in the world wars. The Napalm bomb is an incredible part of our history from which we can learn and not repeat there blunders again.
Thus, it is the duty of the Governments of each and every country to restrict or control the development in science and use it only to the progress of mankind and not for each other’s selfish needs or demonstrate the possession of power.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-19 | Celestina Asantewaa | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 75 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
| 2024-03-02 | LauraTing | 79 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 50
- The following was written as a part of an application for a small business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise Currently the nearest jazz club is 65 miles away thus 67
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 75
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 532, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a gruesome way" with adverb for "gruesome"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...nd acted upon shear rage which ended up in a gruesome way. The 2 cities still suffer with the eff...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, still, therefore, thus, as to, in addition, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1965.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 403.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87593052109 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71190793407 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54094292804 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6651311637 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3181818182 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3181818182 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.95454545455 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153326808821 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0417828028645 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382464386455 0.0758088955206 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0773822127684 0.150359130593 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404587942107 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.