I disagree with the recommendation that governments should place negligible restrictions on scientific research and development. Research while allowing for innovation and development of new ideas and concepts also carries with it several dangers. More often than not scientists set off to achieve something just because it can be done and has never been done before. There is a need for a higher body like the government to ask the question of whether something should be built in the first place. Researchers don't realize the dangers of their own work until much later in the process at which point the damage is already done. This is specially applicable for research areas involving military equipment, bio-weapons etc.
Another reason why the government needs to place strict restrictions on research work is the use of living organisms in testing. Researchers in fields like medicine and skin and hair industry often carry out testing on human and animal subjects. While this is a cardinal stage of the research process, it is crucial for the government to monitor and regulate it very strictly to prevent any harm to the research participants and to make sure that no human rights are being violated in the testing process.
While it may seem like strictly regulated research and development is the way to go, such restrictions also have a caveat, too much restriction can also result in reduced innovative research output. Scientists and researchers may feel like not pursuing their ideas solely because of the amount of restrictions in place. This can have a significantly negative impact on the development of a country.
A feasible approach to tackle this problem is to reach a middle ground, government should place high restrictions on certain research areas like military equipment, bio-weapons, areas with live test subjects etc, meanwhile other research areas that consist of industries which are integral to the development of the country and Innocuous should have relaxed restrictions in comparison. This way the people can be safe and the nation can continue to further develop itself.
- A recently issued twenty year study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin a medicine used to treat headaches Al 50
- The following memorandum is from the president of Primo Doll Manufacturing Inc According to a survey last year of parents who purchased the Elkie our most popular doll 90 percent reported that although their children were extremely satisfied with the doll 66
- The following memo was published by the Welzaton City Commission A recent nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a safety helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets whe 62
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 426, Rule ID: ASK_THE_QUESTION[1]
Message: Use simply 'ask' instead.
Suggestion: ask
...or a higher body like the government to ask the question of whether something should be built in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 430, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
... higher body like the government to ask the question of whether something should be built in the first ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 512, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e built in the first place. Researchers dont realize the dangers of their own work u...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, so, while, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 339.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2418879056 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89152963062 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536873156342 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.1317681762 60.3974514979 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.928571429 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2142857143 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64285714286 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395119186462 0.243740707755 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136317565983 0.0831039109588 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111603887939 0.0758088955206 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243109080123 0.150359130593 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214296460202 0.0667264976115 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.