Governments should place few if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
The upshot of whether to restrict the scientific research and development or not has multiple viewpoints and create a controversial situation. Unquestionably, the points of reduction of overall scope for research and development, if restricted much attention will be given to selected domains and we'll surely achieve success hold a place but can't be claimed to be true in all the case. Nevertheless, restrictions will hamper the development, also inter-related domains will face problems and restricted part will remain undeveloped, these points will always be true. Thus, I would disagree with imposing restrictions on R&D and would argue that governments should not place any restrictions on scientific research and development.
Firstly, imposing restrictions will hamper the development of the nation Moreover, R&D team won't be able to perform any research in the restricted field which is eventually going to hamper the development. And also, the restrictions will cause loss of opportunities. For instance, if the field of Cloud Computing is restricted then the nation won't be able to achieve a significant amount of storage place and the over-the-go facilities would not be implemented as compared to other nations that use Cloud Computing technology.
Secondly, lots of domains take help from other domain's information and work relatively. So, restriction on domain or area of the domain will hamper other related domains improvement. For instance, if research in the area of machines is restricted then the domains where machines are required to a greater extent will lag in comparison to other nations. Thus, restrictions will overall greatly hamper the complete R&D process.
Undeniably, the restriction will reduce the scope for research and development and will increase the chances of achieving success in the selected part. But, this is true in certain cases only. This as a whole will neglect, destroy the chances of being in worlds top nations. Moreover, our nation will remain undeveloped in certain areas. Thus it cannot be generalized and hence should not impose restrictions.
Thus, restrictions on the R&D is surely going to hamper the development of the nation as the nation won't be able to ace in all the fields. However, if there aren't any restrictions then we can surely work on all the parts and aspects to find and create something out of it. So, I believe restrictions on research and development is similar to asl a teen boy not to be crazy about cars and thus, should not be followed!
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | pratysinha | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | asdfjmn | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | OliverRaab | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | seonjungkim | 66 | view |
- The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or role models. 50
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the general manager of KNOW radio station."Several factors indicate that radio station KNOW should shift its programming from rock-and-roll music to a continuous news format. Consider, for example, that the numb 62
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry or other fields is by instilling in them the sense of cooperation, not competition. 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 75
- Governments should place few if any, restrictions on scientific research and development. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 343, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...surely achieve success hold a place but cant be claimed to be true in all the case. ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'domains'' or 'domain's'?
Suggestion: domains'; domain's
...y, lots of domains take help from other domains information and work relatively. So, re...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'domains'' or 'domain's'?
Suggestion: domains'; domain's
...of the domain will hamper other related domains improvement. For instance, if research ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 339, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ll remain undeveloped in certain areas. Thus it cannot be generalized and hence shou...
^^^^
Line 9, column 158, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...ce in all the fields. However, if there arent any restrictions then we can surely wor...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 33.0505617978 33% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2123.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 405.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24197530864 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05965282097 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.449382716049 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 635.4 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0268094213 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.736842105 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3157894737 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47368421053 5.21951772744 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24611247176 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891789036659 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.097902468911 0.0758088955206 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146768102719 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0981141659419 0.0667264976115 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.