Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
government has been set up for the people in order to ensure safe and peaceful living on this earth. Human beings, in general, tend to oversee the hurdles and are imprudent of their future despite the advice rendered by the elders from time to time. if rules are not laid down or restrictions imposed, then one could witness a deprivation of safety in our day to day lives.
The growth of a nation is mirrored through the vast advancement in the scientific and technological side, which is possible only through the scientists of that country. As India’s former president and scientist Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam, rightly pointed out, “By 2020, India will be a developed country”, it is evident that, according to his visionary statement, science is the need of the hour. With the innovative ideas that men could offer, novelistic creations can occur. For example, in olden days, manual cars were prevalent. But nowadays, automatic cars with the latest technologies and safety measures are inserted within the framework of the structure of the car.
Nevertheless, if restrictions are not laid down, then it could lead to the destruction of that nation. The best example is the Hiroshima and Nagasaki nuclear attacks. if the scientists, who had found out the destructive side of nuclear bombs had concealed its features from the outside world, then the attacks that had led to the destruction of the two provinces without leaving a minute trail of life, could have been avoided. Had the government checked the activities of the people in and out of the research community, such an explosion could have been nullified.
Moreover, with the advancement in the field of science, plagiarism and forgery of patent rights have taken a mammoth size. Furthermore, funds could be utilized in a wrong way pertaining to research activities. There will be no fear in the minds of the people and hence the tendency to commit crimes will increase. All this intensification is reduced by governmental laws and the citizens abiding by it.
Thus, to conclude, it can be reiterated that even though science has its own discretions, a proper monitoring could give fruitful results. Today’s youngsters are freelance thinkers and precocious, who never mind about the dangers that lie ahead of them. men are tuned to behave in such a way right from their childhood and the reason behind it is their inquisitiveness. However, adopting proper methods and following certain rules will surely avoid them to fall into mishaps.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-16 | Navis | 16 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | 1172910232 | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | 1172910232 | 16 | view |
| 2019-01-08 | evanlu | 66 | view |
| 2015-09-08 | negin papen | 40 | view |
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements withing that field. 50
- In order for any work of art-for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song-to have merit, it must be understandable to most people. 58
- tpo 6Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children. 70
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. I 58
- In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya will soon become extinct. Experts a 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Government
government has been set up for the people in order...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 251, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...ndered by the elders from time to time. if rules are not laid down or restrictions...
^^
Line 9, column 168, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...Hiroshima and Nagasaki nuclear attacks. if the scientists, who had found out the d...
^^
Line 13, column 161, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong way" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e. Furthermore, funds could be utilized in a wrong way pertaining to research activities. Ther...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 260, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Men
...out the dangers that lie ahead of them. men are tuned to behave in such a way right...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, thus, for example, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2120.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 414.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12077294686 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87012226412 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596618357488 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9334557186 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0612322846858 0.243740707755 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0180156051386 0.0831039109588 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0190702735719 0.0758088955206 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0305840087464 0.150359130593 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.014577304286 0.0667264976115 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.