The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and suppo

The prompt claims that we can learn much more from like-minded people those whose views contradict our own because disagreement can cause tension, demotivation, and impede learning. The given topic is highly contentious because different people may have disparate positions and opinions on the given topic. Some may go for the topic, while others can't argue with it all. I am going to both agree and disagree with the given claims that we can usually learn much more from people whose views we share from those who contradict our own. The three reasons and examples supporting my position are presented in the following paragraphs.

Firstly, at the present time mobile phones are the most essential part of everyone. it helps to talk to two or more two people who are not for the same reasons and transfer the information from one place to another place. But, it gives harmful radiation, that causes eye damage as well as other effects that may be aroused. For instance, an automobile can be used to find the shortest distance for traveling. However, that can generate problems like road accidents, and traffic management. Hence, the rapid pace of life today causes more problems.

Furthermore, The rapid growth of the population may arouse problems in different medical fields. For example, Due to COVID-19 all around the world, there are around 7010617 people deaths. In addition, it was started in China and different countries make disparate vaccines for treatments of the Coronavirus. Some countries make good vaccines, While others have bad effects and those effects were seen after a long time, as well as the deaths of some people. Therefore, increasing rapid growth today causes more problems.

Lastly, today most people are based on technology. Every small work is done by machine. For instance, Scientists developed the calculator to solve big problems like multiplication, additions, and other hard problems. Although, most people use calculators to solve simple problems, that reduces the critical thinking capability of humans and may problems in the future. Consequently, the rapid growth of life today causes complex problems.

To sum up, the reasons and examples presented support the claims/positions that both agree and disagree on the given topic. The essay highlights the rapid growth that become a problem in the future. The examples illustrate the automobile, COVID-19 and simple examples of calculators advocate the given statements.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 348, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...Some may go for the topic, while others cant argue with it all. I am going to both a...
^^^^
Line 1, column 372, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...c, while others cant argue with it all. I am going to both agree and disagree wit...
^
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...re the most essential part of everyone. it helps to talk to two or more two people...
^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ulators advocate the given statements.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, lastly, may, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, as well as, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2081.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 393.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2951653944 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72886260936 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531806615776 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2393720856 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7083333333 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.375 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 5.21951772744 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177581853839 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566269847385 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551020750934 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1006269801 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020862193709 0.0667264976115 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.