It is more harmful to compromise one's own beliefs than to adhere to them.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
All human has some beliefs that structure their life and drive them towards their goal. People generally build up these beliefs by their own understanding, environment, and experience. But the existence of these diversified beliefs drive humankind towards the modern civilization that we live today. These diversified beliefs helped us to edify our moral and social views towards the whole time. But there has been a long going debate about whether it is justified that a person should always adhere to his own belief or he can compromise his own belief if there is a better one. I mostly disagree that compromising one's own belief is harmful than to adhering to it on basis of two reasons stated below.
Firstly, when a person becomes so dogmatic that he is never ready to accept that there may be some flaws in his belief, it will not be ethical at all. For example, during the time of Gallelio, the church never ready to accept that the sun is in the center of our solar system and they continued to punish those scholars who refute it. Eventually, they were totally wrong. But their dogmatic mindset had caused several violent deaths of the scholars like Gallelio, Hypeshia and Keplar. So, if you always keep the mindset that, compromising our belief will be harmful than it will cause us in long run.
Secondly, if a person is always dogmatic about his own beliefs and never try to consider the other viewpoint than it will eventually cause conflict in the society. One thing is evident in throughout the history is that change is only constant in the history. THe way of thinking in ancient way will be completely different than today. This also appiled to all caste, race and so on. So, if we always keep in our mind that we should never compromis our belief than it will eventually cause conflicts in society. For example, the Nazi regime of Hitler.
Though, sometimes we just want to compromise our belief in order to establish peace with the opposing party, these can also be harmful to the society. There could be possibiluty that opposite viewpoint is completely wrong and agreeing to that we just playing safe. So, during the evaluation of whether we should compromise or not, both sides should be more progressive and show good judgement to check the validity of opposition belief. So, I mostly disagree with the prompt.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-09 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 70 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 16 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 50 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to 50
- It is more harmful to compromise one s own beliefs than to adhere to them Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting 54
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...ncient way will be completely different than today. This also appiled to all caste, ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...o appiled to all caste, race and so on. So, if we always keep in our mind that we shou...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 33.0505617978 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1934.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 404.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78712871287 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50990587224 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502475247525 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.2511259428 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0952380952 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2380952381 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178817697818 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543332810715 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586854710685 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104414111436 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401761767589 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...ncient way will be completely different than today. This also appiled to all caste, ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...o appiled to all caste, race and so on. So, if we always keep in our mind that we shou...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 33.0505617978 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1934.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 404.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78712871287 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50990587224 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502475247525 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.2511259428 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0952380952 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2380952381 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178817697818 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543332810715 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586854710685 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104414111436 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401761767589 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.