There is a claim that we should define ourselves firstly by our identification with social groups. It is undeniably true that we often realize ourselves through different groups where we work or do research; however, everything is multifaced, a traditional definition of ourselves may be wrong and what constitutes us inherently is influenced by not only social groups but also other perspectives.
In the first place, social groups help us define ourselves. Sometimes we cannot make sure how great an achievement we can be limited by the environment where we grow up and live. For example, Jack Ma was considering how to build an electronic business company after witnessing a wonderful word connecting everyone on the Internet. He initially got lost in a problem that lacked necessary capital, essential techniques and fundamental manpower to realize his dream. Then a team, including 18 people who were attracted by Ma and became Ma's earliest employees, offered those important conditions and built the famous Alibaba with Ma. It is convincing to conduct that this group of people help Ma build his dream and define himself as a successful business man.
However, a conventional realization by other groups on ourselves might be canned even unfair. There were many conflicts among different groups because some groups ruled and disdained other groups and also many resistances. Gandhi called for his adherents to implement nonviolent and noncooperation movements to liberate Indians from colonial rule. Mandela was limited to a small island for 27 years because he tried his best to break apartheid in South Africa. Martin Luther King Jr. promoted the American civil rights movement. Those examples, fighting against discrimination and inequality, indict the enduring identification, some social groups on other groups, could be inimical.
Finally, from the perspective of individuals, it is possible that identification with social groups might be a misguidance for us. As individuals, we can take Franklin D. Roosevelt as an instance. When Roosevelt ran for Governor, he faced opponents' doubt his ability to govern a state because he had a disability after fighting a forest fire and jumped into the cold sea. Roosevelt cleverly stated that A Governor did not have to be an acrobat with the ability to do two backflip and a handspring and the work of the governorship was brain work. From the instance of Roosevelt, unfair realization can build wrong definitions of ourselves if we lack the ability to discern it and we must fight with those groups that treat us unequally.
In sum, it is rational that we define ourselves temperately through identification with social groups because they might help us to take our first step to further achievement. But a correct realization of ourselves cannot arbitrarily rely on others.
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing a 72
- Over the past two years the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the numbe 60
- Some people believe that government officials must carry out the will of the people they serve Others believe that officials should base their decisions on their own judgment Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 650, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'conducting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'convince' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: conducting
...amous Alibaba with Ma. It is convincing to conduct that this group of people help Ma build...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 473, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'backflip' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'backflips'.
Suggestion: backflips
...e an acrobat with the ability to do two backflip and a handspring and the work of the go...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, then, for example, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2389.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 453.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27373068433 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02683059223 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55408388521 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 748.8 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.6548104156 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.761904762 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52380952381 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203895943131 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677994301629 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685952918766 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139579514438 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593501677909 0.0667264976115 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.