Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
As our race of human-beings progress more and more into this world, the laws are becoming more intricate and evolving to a better form. The prompt suggests that laws should not be a stringent set of rules, it should be more malleable when eclectic times, spaces, and circumstances are considered. I mostly agree with this opinion, but also acknowledge that it does have a few drawbacks.
At first, we should look into our history, when draconian laws were strictly applied. We do not have to back in pre-historic times, we can glimpse into the mid 16th-17th centuries, when the priests were the authoritative figures in the society. Galileo, one of the pantheons of science, were a proponent of Copernicus's idea of Sun being the center of the solar system. Up until Nicolas Copernicus, who looked into the sky with not so technologically cutting edge, but rather a austere telescope, he saw a discrepancy between the planetary motions. Only by placing Sun in the center, these miscalculations go away, with the help of Keplar's mathematical background, Copernicus developed a logical Heliocentric or sun centered solar system. But his society's authoritative figures condemned him, renounced him for his book about this idea. After a quite some time, Galileo realized that Copernicus's idea was correct. Therefore, he tried to support this idea publicly. The priests again came forward to prosecute Galileo; As punishments, He had to announce that this idea was incorrect and was locked into his home until his death. This was a powerful exercise of law at that time. Even now, in some countries, science is looked down upon and many scientific minded people are prosecuted due to these kind of laws. Ergo, laws should not be so rigid.
Additionally, there are phenomenons where laws have to flexible inorder to have a fair and unbiased prosecutions. For example, a blind man may run into the street in red light, and cause a small havoc. If a street police arrests him and treats him similarly to a thug who intentinally ran into red light is not fair. If a human is in dire need of medical assistance and he parked his car in "no parking" zone because he was in a hurry. And if he were to be charged for this petty crime, is not morally correct.
However, there will always be people who will try to take advantage of a flexible set of laws. Before making such flexibility to the laws, there should be a exhaustive research behind every laws. So that, the sordid people can not have the opportunity to get the better off from the laws.
In conclusion, as inflexible laws are responsible for the sufferings of innocent people, making them too flexible is not a good idea also. There should be a perfect balance between them, which should be achieved.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-21 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-29 | mei_unavailable | 58 | view |
| 2023-12-29 | mei_unavailable | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | Siddhant412 | 92 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | SamikshaVarpe | 58 | view |
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffeee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 67
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free 61
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together Do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...were strictly applied. We do not have to back in pre-historic times, we can glimp...
^^
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...echnologically cutting edge, but rather a austere telescope, he saw a discrepancy...
^
Line 3, column 1292, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...fic minded people are prosecuted due to these kind of laws. Ergo, laws should not be so ri...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...lexibility to the laws, there should be a exhaustive research behind every laws. ...
^
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'exhaustive research'.
Suggestion: exhaustive research
...lexibility to the laws, there should be a exhaustive research behind every laws. So that, the sordid ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 134, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ng them too flexible is not a good idea also. There should be a perfect balance betw...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, similarly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2303.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 472.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87923728814 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83382959404 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548728813559 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 733.5 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.10617977528 322% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.1141172158 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.12 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.88 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.12 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146884574582 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435475933222 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425165307929 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0929112218269 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436534535556 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.