Laws should not be rigid or fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
In this modern era, laws play vital in maintaining peace and harmony. laws representations the rules and principles that a person need to follow to live in a society. Historians say that laws have invented very long back, when people realized that are living in society to maintain peace they need to set few rules. However, it is important to make sure that the laws are objective and same for everyone irrespective of his race, caste and nation. I completely agree to the authors opinion regarding flexibility of laws. Rules must be flexible. Since, there many different circumstances in which a crime takes place. We need to make our rules adaptable to all the situation so that the culprit does not escape from the law.
First and foremost, we should not be obstinate and be obsessed with rules, believe their no other case possible. However, we need to be flexible with laws. Since, we are progressing we are accessible to numerous tools which where not available in past and have become cunning to find loop holes in the law. Hence, we need to be ready for all the situations. For instance, it the past there were few confined means transport. However at present we have numerous ways to escape from the countries so it easy for some to escape. So, even if someone does it possible for a country to ask help from the ally nation fro their police to catch him.
secondly, in the past rules where designed according to race, caste and nationality of a person. However, it is changed now, law is same for everyone and there is no partiality. For example, in past, people from royal family had different rules and had leniency towards laws. King had power to manipulate rules according to him. But, as their no kings in this present world we have democracy and communism in which the leaders are elected by the people. Hence, irrespective of his rank everyone has same rules.
Thirdly, We need to free our self's from this parochial laws, which no longer have place in this modern world. there are numerous examples where we had changed the laws to remove partiality like in the past people where punished for being homosexual there were told that this was against nature. however, now gays are free to live where they want and their also situations where homosexuals have attained a respectable place like politicians and businessman.
Recently government has passed a law regarding triple talaq, initially husband can divorce his wife by telling talaq three times. But, their is not rational towards women and government has changed rule that people will be seriously punished if its followed.
To sum up, I completely agree to the author's opinion that rules are made for the people and not vice-versa. we have authority to change it when we realize it not objective and being unfair for person just because he from different race, caste and nationality. We need to progress and make changes in law so that no escapes by taking advantages of the loop holes present in the law.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-28 | jason123 | 79 | view |
2020-01-13 | jason123 | 66 | view |
2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 50 | view |
2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 16 | view |
2019-12-10 | p30kh40 | 50 | view |
- Laws should not be rigid or fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places. 50
- "Unlike great thinkers and great artists, the most effective political leaders must often yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise." 50
- Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership 50
- It is dangerous to trust only intelligence. 16
- Those who treat politics and morality as though they were separate realms fail to understand either the one or the other 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Laws
...vital in maintaining peace and harmony. laws representations the rules and principle...
^^^^
Line 1, column 475, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...e and nation. I completely agree to the authors opinion regarding flexibility of laws. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 547, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ility of laws. Rules must be flexible. Since, there many different circumstances in ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 560, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
.... Rules must be flexible. Since, there many different circumstances in which a crime takes pl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 390, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uations. For instance, it the past there were few confined means transport. Howev...
^^
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ere were few confined means transport. However at present we have numerous ways to esc...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 612, Rule ID: FOR_FRO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for'?
Suggestion: for
...ountry to ask help from the ally nation fro their police to catch him. secondly,...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...ation fro their police to catch him. secondly, in the past rules where designed accor...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 192, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...nd there is no partiality. For example, in past, people from royal family had different...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 111, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...longer have place in this modern world. there are numerous examples where we had chan...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 296, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...were told that this was against nature. however, now gays are free to live where they w...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 136, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...wife by telling talaq three times. But, their is not rational towards women and gover...
^^^^^
Line 12, column 38, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... To sum up, I completely agree to the authors opinion that rules are made for the peo...
^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 109, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...made for the people and not vice-versa. we have authority to change it when we rea...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, for example, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 33.0505617978 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2480.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 517.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79690522244 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76839952204 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54088529476 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47001934236 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 800.1 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2761416579 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5172413793 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8275862069 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.24137931034 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 7.80617977528 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135223447528 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422898231461 0.0831039109588 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462988797487 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0768944532961 0.150359130593 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379613021572 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.