Luck plays more of a role in determining success than work ethic does
Luck can be defined in several ways. Some school of thought would define it as when opportunity meets preparation while to others, its when something happens by chance rather than preparation. There are several success stories out there most of which glorify work ethics as the main reason for success. While this is plausible, the influence of luck cannot be undermined.
There are several ways in which one can become successful through luck. One example is being born into a wealthy family. The probability of this happening is 1 in a million, so it can be regarded as sheer luck. It can be argued that this individuals from rich homes don’t require as much hard work as the average person since they have enough resources at their disposal to achieve what they want and on time too.
Sometimes, you are called lucky because some good things you didn’t plan for or expect happens to you or rather simply, you get appointed for a job or role you are not qualified for. In such case, the amount of time it would have taken you to get to such a role or position through hardwork is shortened with luck. The form in which you are lucky could present in different ways too. For example, there might not have been any better qualified candidate applying for the same role and the company just had to settle for you.
On the other hand, the importance of work ethics in success cannot be ignored. Infact, you are more likely to succeed with hard work than sheer luck. Using Cristiano Ronaldo for example, who is a world class football player. We could see that although, he had the talent, he still had to put in extra effort and work to become the best football player in the world. He wasn’t waiting to be lucky and hoping every other football player would just be worse than him in football one way or another. However, can we say that CR7 was even lucky to be recognized by football scouts to be able to help him reach his full potential? Yes, we certainly can.
In conclusion, while luck plays a big role in the success stories of many people and celebrities, the importance a strong work ethics cannot be dismissed. Sometimes you may need a combination of both to be able to achieve that which you desire.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-05 | Haymide | 54 | view |
| 2021-08-01 | Geet@3 | 58 | view |
| 2021-07-30 | Sumanayana | 50 | view |
| 2021-07-30 | Sumanayana | 54 | view |
| 2021-07-16 | Himanshi Rana | 50 | view |
- Erasmus mundus masters in public health scholarship Why public health and this double degree programme how career plans are connected to this programme justification for second year specialization in occupational and enviromental health sciences Area of p
- Luck plays more of a role in determining success than work ethic does 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...nity meets preparation while to others, its when something happens by chance rather...
^^^
Line 2, column 233, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ed as sheer luck. It can be argued that this individuals from rich homes don’t requi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...didn’t plan for or expect happens to you or rather simply, you get appointed for ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1822.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 398.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57788944724 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37469488111 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522613065327 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.6386626268 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7619047619 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9523809524 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213180294211 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712012931778 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848918594523 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129757828571 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568167102436 0.0667264976115 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 14.1392134831 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 48.8420337079 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 12.1743820225 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 12.1639044944 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.