Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The statement cites, the government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve. Government officials are appointed to serve a specific duty of the society so that people can avail certain government provided facilities easily. Hence, the officials are appointed for the people of the society they should carry out the will of the people they serve instead of relying on their own judgment.
In our society, due to the lack of information and not easy to reach officials who can help, lots of people are deprived of the government implemented schemes. For example, if somebody wants to avail for education loan from a government bank which as better advantages than private sector banks and if the application does not seem appropriate to the concerned official based on his own judgement most likely it would be rejected. But the government has already a set of predefined rules to approve specific applications. Instead of using their own judgement if government officials follow those rules and the applicant adhere to those rules then he is eligible for the particular loan. In this way, it will bring more interest to people to access the government facilities.
Furthermore, if government officials start relying on their own judgment it will unlikely serve the purpose for which and for whom they are appointed. For instance, if a certain company go to avail approval for setting up a new factory to the particular region. Though if that company submits valid documents needed but according to the officials own judgment if they think the factory may cause pollution and environmental damage hance does not grant permission. If the officials think it can cause potential damage they may request for government enquiry if not done before instead of rejecting it upright, if there is any such rule to initiate such enquiry at that stage. In this case, it may cause the potential damage to the society if the factory would not set up as the new factory could create new employment and boost the economy. Thus such implementation would not be advantageous.
In conclusion, all government officials should follow the rules defined by the government to carry out a particular task instead of relying on their own judgment and should unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve if they adhere to those rules.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-15 | Raian Islam | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | Harsha98 | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | shiki | 66 | view |
| 2019-07-24 | Gh.Ne | 66 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | isaackoshy | 33 | view |
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 50
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagre 50
- Some people claim that a nation's government should preserve its wilderness areas in their natural state. Others argue that these areas should be developed for potential economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns wi 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 841, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...e new employment and boost the economy. Thus such implementation would not be advant...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 12.9106741573 209% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2008.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 398.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04522613065 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80788084568 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.434673366834 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 628.2 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8034012622 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.866666667 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5333333333 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321502949284 0.243740707755 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13014576373 0.0831039109588 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14098655191 0.0758088955206 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248225359421 0.150359130593 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118322924512 0.0667264976115 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.