The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.
We are surrounded with technologies, conveniences and luxuries that make our lives easier. In fact, some of the things we do today requires almost zero effort. But before asserting that these tools and services prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals, one has to furnish enough evidence to be able to refute the contrary. The conveniences that we take for granted indeed aid in becoming independent at rather early age. Contribution of services like cabs, social media etc. to making a child smart should not be overlooked.
Normal perception is that the products of technology is hampering the all-round development of the young ones. But this is not the case and as a matter of fact, one could argue that the opposite militates against the statement in question. In the olden days parents did not allow their children to travel alone. But now, due to ubiquitous online cab services along with live tracking features, parents are less disinclined to allow their children to travel on their own. This will certainly help them in becoming an independent individual at a young age.
When we consider the positive effects of social media, then it becomes apparent that, if used unerringly, they can play a major role in making a person strong, well informed and less dependent on someone else. Because it exposes the minds of the people to unprecedented amount of facts and data, almost no culture is alien to them. This amount of experience translates into them becoming a stronger human.
We can have knowledge about almost any subject whenever we want using internet. It bestows so much information about the world around us that was simply impossible to get in the past. With all these conveniences, proper development is ineluctable.
Nevertheless, there are some disadvantages of the luxuries bestowed upon us. Technology has engulfed the youth which, for the reasons discussed above, is not always as bad as it appears. They are continuously learning new things which will gradually make them more mature more quickly.
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with the honest assessment. 50
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than 23
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 62
- The main reason we should study history is to ensure that we do not repeat the mistakes of the past.Write a response in which you examine your own position on the statement. Explore the extent to which you either agree or disagree with it, and support you 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...es that make our lives easier. In fact, some of the things we do today requires almost zero...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, nevertheless, so, then, well, as to, in fact, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 338.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13017751479 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80092993506 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621301775148 0.4932671777 126% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.6563008241 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18214198746 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435791290788 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081191897705 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0833316530009 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0968649837298 0.0667264976115 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.