The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times.
The upshot of the given issue has multiple viewpoints and those create a controversial situation. Unquestionably, by studying the history we understand lots of other than how people lived in earlier days. Nevertheless, we'll get to know how people were in the earlier days and it would even clarify the view of how people lived in earlier days. According to me, yes, the main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times.
Firstly, we'll understand how people were in the earlier days. Moreover, history as a whole tells us much about how people get to know various things and got adapted to it. It basically tells how human life evolved. But if you consider the living habits of a human it never changed. For instance, people in earlier days used leaves to cover themselves. Nowadays also people use clothes in replacement of the leaves but the basic habit if a human to cover himself is intact. Thus, we'll get a greater insight into the way people lived in earlier days.
Secondly, it will clarify the ways in which people in earlier days understood any given situation and how they tackled it. As the history gives detailed knowledge about the people and their habitat we can clearly understand their way of living and could claim that the way people lived before did not change rather it just evolved with time.
Undoubtedly, history does not only mentions about the people but there are other things too like how the nature changed over a period. This is true in a specific situation but considering the fact that we also get to know about the people and thus can generalize that the main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | batterylow_123 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-17 | raghavchauhan619 | 54 | view |
| 2023-10-07 | AmieeZhao | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | maryle | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | wopona8219 | 66 | view |
- Governments should place few if any, restrictions on scientific research and development. 66
- The following appeared in an e-mail sent by the marketing director of the Classical Shakespeare Theatre of Bardville."Over the past ten years, there has been a 20 percent decline in the size of the average audience at Classical Shakespeare Theatre product 72
- The data from a survey of high school math and science teachers show that in the district of Sanlee many of these teachers reported assigning daily homework, whereas in the district of Marlee, most science and math teachers reported assigning homework no 86
- In surveys, Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating, and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes lit 49
- Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 345, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...ew of how people lived in earlier days. According to me, yes, the main benefit of the study of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'mention'
Suggestion: mention
.... Undoubtedly, history does not only mentions about the people but there are other th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 321.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77258566978 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4851535564 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461059190031 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 479.7 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.4649159422 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.133333333 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 5.21951772744 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.575545882928 0.243740707755 236% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.2105859635 0.0831039109588 253% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.239805343003 0.0758088955206 316% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.409337475668 0.150359130593 272% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.196565170918 0.0667264976115 295% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 100.480337079 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.