Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts
By government officials and political experts mentioned in the argument, I will discuss based on the assumption that we are talking about the liberal democratic constitution which is a democratic government with capitalistic economy. On fundamental basis, Democracy itself a representation of the people. Democratic government is one which reflects what people wants. So the given argument proves to be false in that basic connotation itself.
The decision making on any matters be it trivial or non trivial can be classified into two ways : the first one is doing what the people wants which will cater to the welfare of all people. Second is a decision made by the oligarchical political group which will arrive to the conclusion on what is best for the people. It will be much more appropriate if we discuss both the ways of governing.
Analysing the first method, people are the roots of the nation. All leaders represent their people. Taking into account of these it is important to understand that it is very much essential for taking the subjects’ feedback and necessities as a significant criteria for decision making or the conclusion itself to be made by whosoever concern. If a bunch of natives are opposing a factory in their locality which might affect their eco system, it is mandatory for the government to get rid of the plan. At the same time, as no day comes without night , not all people’ choices ought to be the correct one. If the majority of the people thinks that women should not be educated, then the public opinion should not be endorsed.
Now bringing the second theory to spotlight, on matters that needs a diplomatic approach not a mob mindset, the decision by small group of authorities will be what the circumstance needs. If in particular locality dalits are not allowed inside the temple, it is the authority’s primary duty to decide on abolishing untouchability. Speaking of which, the same boon poses a greater threat of leading to conservative oligarchial governing suppressing the right of expression leading to fascist despotic rule the result of which will make mankind to go back to medieval period.
On weighing both the circumstances and by measuring the impact of consequence, it will be conspicuous that the decision made by the subjects of the nation or the decision that reflects the people’s need will be the one that can put a nation in the ethical and dignified path striving for both social and economic growth providing the deciding committee must comprise the representation of all people ensuring equity and equality.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-29 | batterylow_123 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-26 | Zahid6400 | 50 | view |
| 2023-11-07 | Ying_CHU4.0 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | sam 27 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-16 | Jeyodi123 | 66 | view |
- The amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year 2016
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively 83
- The table below gives information about past and projected population figures in various countries for different years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves 75
- Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 258, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'criterion'?
Suggestion: criterion
...edback and necessities as a significant criteria for decision making or the conclusion i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 551, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...same time, as no day comes without night , not all people’ choices ought to be the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, then, in particular, speaking of, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2159.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 429.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03263403263 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9274950615 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508158508159 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 673.2 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 95.8958489239 60.3974514979 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2352941176 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11764705882 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182359308787 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0561009874473 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539846565017 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101374613814 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293756074445 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.