Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through large quantities of information and find what’s important.
I don't remember the last time I was not sifting through multiple links in order to complete my assignment. Veritably, one can claim that we all have been there searching through google for content, well because of numerous reasons, firstly it's efficient and we are able to gain knowledge about anything in that is the reason, today there are more people in the world who are "Jack of all, Master of none". We have become so used to the idea of going through compendium that we really don't have a specific prowess, which is required to comment warranted on a topic.
The emergence of new theories and inventions were celebrating heyday during the 1900s, partly because people used to go through a tone of books for the purpose of gaining knowledge which enabled them to draw more astute deductions which further led to an evolution in terms of various fields in sciences, economics, politics. The volume of research in the 20th century is although surging and has genuine potential, that potential may never be reached if people base solely on facts and papers from the internet. Further, the quality of research has severely depleted, a lot of papers on computer science today share the same breakthroughs and there is a lack of ingenuity, partly because of so many lacking journals but still, more than redundancy novel information is required. Henc, for the achieving novelty researchers have to deeply study quality content which cannot be achieved through current practices as it reduces our attention span.
People using the internet always are in quandary about multitasking a.k.a sifting through multiple link or focus on finding the perfect link with most of the relevant information. With the time people, today, spend on their work or research, they have to employ the multi-tasking approach, during which they toil, making sure that have covered each and every important aspect of a topic but still a majority of works are found lacking in terms of authenticity and due to lack of attention.
Although there may be the certain situations and probably internet is a boon is providing us with an abundance of information, we need to change the way we research on internet trading of multi-tasking and attention to a particular document in a tantamount manner.
Hence, a reduction in the attention span has brought more harm than good to society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-19 | Adesina Boluwatito | 58 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | haemanth10 | 66 | view |
| 2022-10-05 | asm01 | 58 | view |
| 2022-09-30 | anil paltya | view | |
| 2022-07-09 | sally_tt | 66 | view |
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal rec 52
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until college 66
- According to a recent report by our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actual 62
- The following is a letter from the parent of a private school student to the principal of that school Last year Kensington Academy turned over management of its cafeteria to a private vendor Swift Nutrition This company serves low fat low calorie meals th 59
- Mass media and the internet have caused people s attention spans to get shorter However the overall effect has been positive while people are less able to focus on one thing they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through large quan 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 3, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
I dont remember the last time I was not siftin...
^^^^
Line 1, column 368, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...oday there are more people in the world who are 'Jack of all, Master of none'...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 495, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...going through compendium that we really dont have a specific prowess, which is requi...
^^^^
Line 7, column 242, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a tantamount manner" with adverb for "tantamount"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... and attention to a particular document in a tantamount manner. Hence, a reduction in the attent...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...icular document in a tantamount manner. Hence, a reduction in the attention span...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, really, so, still, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1982.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 395.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01772151899 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72670568459 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577215189873 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 23.0359550562 152% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.619502183 60.3974514979 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 180.181818182 118.986275619 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.9090909091 23.4991977007 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218069320416 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788901520896 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334359980159 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11632262508 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203976272211 0.0667264976115 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 14.1392134831 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 48.8420337079 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.8971910112 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 11.2143820225 143% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.