Men and women are not equal in terms of physical strength for many tasks.

Essay topics:

Men and women are not equal in terms of physical strength for many tasks.

Overuling the obvious vertical discrimination, I believe, that the argument is valid on three grounds. First, difference in cognitive wiring between men and women. Second, different biomechanics and third different socio-economic up bringing conditions.

Many have noticed the fact that women discern colours much better than most men, more often than not in humours settings. Also, consider a behavioural experiment conducted by social scientists as per which they set a travelling agency to which unsuspecting subjects were brought. They were set to talk to an unkept and less formally dressed agent initially, whom they swapped with a neat and formally dressed agent after about ten minutes from start of the experiment. More women noticed the change than men. Another experiment from late twentyth century claimed that womens' brain process orgasms differently than mens', the chemical pathways are disctintively differently accessed in the two. Futher experiments in behavioural sciences have begun supporting the hypothesis that the wiring in women's' brains are different from mens'. This not only implies that the wrinings are different, it also means that since the wrinings are different even the physical menisfestations of the brains are different. So even when it comes to cognitive tasks women might be suited to different tasks than men, obviously this does not imply that they will be worse or better than men, it simply means that they might take different approaches which could be be better or worse, efficacy wise.

The differences in biomechanics is very apparently different and so women are less suited for labourintensive tasks than men. It is valid in inverse direction too some tasks require flexibility which very few men might be capable of.

The sociao-economic conditions under which both sexes are brought up are drastically different. They grow up facing different expectations and different endowments. These are so ingrained in daily taht they are mostly missed. Say, take the latest trend, manspreading, due to basic differnt body language it so happens that bothsit differentl

Disregarding any sentimentalities regarding the sensitive nature of the issue at hand and considering the inherent physical differences between women and men, one will observe very obvious strenghts and weakness in both the sexes. So it is indeed the case that men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks. Thus there will exist some tasks which will be better suited for men and so will those tasks which are better suited for women. Inducing from the above statement, only after this fact is properly acknowledged and respected in a greedless manner, that proper and utilitarian allocation of tasks and resources can be acheived and thus efficient and equitable division of labur can be proposed.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-03 Zahid6400 66 view
2024-01-26 LauraTing 58 view
2023-09-25 Isolus 83 view
2023-09-02 Mahima1902 54 view
2023-08-23 Krisha Lakhani 50 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1239, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: be
...t take different approaches which could be be better or worse, efficacy wise. Th...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 362, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... are not equally suited for many tasks. Thus there will exist some tasks which will ...
^^^^
Line 17, column 585, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a greedless manner" with adverb for "greedless"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... is properly acknowledged and respected in a greedless manner, that proper and utilitarian allocation...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, first, if, regarding, second, so, third, thus

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2432.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 450.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40444444444 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88849228047 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526666666667 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 746.1 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.0579489735 60.3974514979 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.6 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.15 5.21951772744 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20254369177 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739858220893 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102012712243 0.0758088955206 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112068416707 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0842505367732 0.0667264976115 126% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.