technology is deteriorating humans ability to think
From the dawn of the industrial revolution everything has evolved at an unprecedented speed, from the days of steam engine we have come to the day when even the light bulbs are smart. And along with this boost in science and technology has come a crippling dependency on technology. Despite the pressing need of technology ranging complicated tasks like building a space ship to everyday tasks like driving to work, the ability of humans to think has not detoriated. Following are three primamry reasons for the same.
As technology advanced humans freed themselves from labour intensive jobs which were extremely time consuming. This transition meant that man now could afford to invest time in art and studies are than simply surviving the pre industrial revolution era. It implied that they could now invest themselves on improving technology furthermore. Thus not only advancement of technology meant that improved lifestyle, it also menat that man was expanding his thinking to invent a new world. If not increase it would have required persistance in thinking ability, thereby dependence on technology would by no means imply deteriotaion in thinking ability.
Further builing on the argument, since man had time and aptitute to invest s/he would have had conceived of new fields to explore and study. This would lead to mutifacet evolution of man's cogntive ability to think. Thereby, different cognitive process might emerge with the advancement of technology which were earlier not required, changing the defination of 'thinking'. For example in historic Japan women were taught soft skills like flower arrangement and hospitality. It was considered imperative for them to have basic knowledge, this meant that their visio-spatial sketchpad would be much more developed than present day women who are much more focused on, say, typing. With advancement of technology skillset has alsi changed over the years and thus what was considered as the 'ability to think' has also evolved so simply implying that ability to think has deteriotated due to dependence on technology would be incorrect.
With technological advancement also came innovation and not only to invent these but also to use them thinking outside the box becomes important at times. Thus in a way technology have even imporved our ability to think. Tecnology has indeed made us more dependent even for simple tasks like searching for a bakery or looking up definations of words and surely we no longer need memorise phone numbers, but it has by no means deterioted our ability to think.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-15 | guozhishan | 66 | view |
| 2024-04-12 | Zahid6400 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 33 | view |
| 2024-02-01 | jahot | 66 | view |
| 2024-02-01 | jahot | 66 | view |
- Invest in unmanned space exploration. 69
- "A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college" 50
- Statement of Purpose 16
- Computerized Voting System 85
- In any enterprise the process of making or doing something is ultimately more important than the final product Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above Support your point of view with reasons and or examples from 30
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 399, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ding a space ship to everyday tasks like driving to work, the ability of humans t...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ree primamry reasons for the same. As technology advanced humans freed themse...
^^
Line 5, column 341, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...es on improving technology furthermore. Thus not only advancement of technology mean...
^^^^
Line 5, column 504, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had required'?
Suggestion: had required
... invent a new world. If not increase it would have required persistance in thinking ability, thereb...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 156, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ide the box becomes important at times. Thus in a way technology have even imporved ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, so, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 28.8173652695 101% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 55.5748502994 110% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2157.0 2260.96107784 95% => OK
No of words: 412.0 441.139720559 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2354368932 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79903413549 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 204.123752495 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543689320388 0.468620217663 116% => OK
syllable_count: 690.3 705.55239521 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.76447105788 11% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7101183265 57.8364921388 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.833333333 119.503703932 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 23.324526521 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.05555555556 5.70786347227 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.20758483034 183% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.88822355289 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316981614382 0.218282227539 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104409656461 0.0743258471296 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.099379029568 0.0701772020484 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200874384858 0.128457276422 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177913722505 0.0628817314937 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.3799401198 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.3550499002 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.5979740519 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.32208582834 105% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 98.500998004 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 12.3882235529 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.