Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
Men and women are inherently different. Right from the early ages, men were the sole bread earners of the family while women were the ones who looked after the household. None of these tasks in any way inferior to the other. Both required a skillset that the other gender was earlier, devoid of. But evolution of mankind dictated that the boundary between the differences between the two genders became less and less prominent.Each gender could fit perfectly into a role that was earlier touted as unsuitable for them. I donot completely agree with the statement that due to inherent physical differences, men and women are not equally suited for many tasks.
The main physical difference between the two genders is that of strength. Since in the early ages, men went for hunting and tasks that required a physical presence, hence men are characterized by more physical strength than women, while women performed tasks that required more mental strength like taking care of the house and raising children and are hence characterized by a lesser physical strength. With changing times, women now are as capable as men in terms of performing activities that require immense muscle strength. They have entered fields that were previously exclusive to men like lumberjacking. The task of lumberjacking is one that requires an immense amount of body strength and women have been able to adapt to this task. It is also not surprising now to see a women in the gym, lifting weights that are as heavy as men. Similary, men have also adapted to the changing times. It is not rare to see a couple with roles of the yester years switched where the woman of the family earns the bread while the man stays athome and looks after the family. Tailoring and cooking which were once tasks that were only performed by women due to the delicate hands, have now become male dominant industries.
Eventhough the division between the physical differences between men and women has kept getting blur, it has not yet vanished. Men are still more physically strong in general while women lack this trait naturally. Women on the other hand are characterized by delicacy in their task which is not inherent in men. There are some fields like some sports, where eventhough women have come a long way in but have not yet reached the physical capabilities of men. Women are not inherently gifted with strength while most men are and hence a women would have to work a lot harder to achieve the physical strength that a man would find alot easier achieving. For example, in competitions that test physical strength exclusively, men and women are divided in different categories because of the difference in the pwoer that men and women can exert. Though women have been getting closer to breaching the barrier, there is still a long time to go but there is no doubt that there will be a time when men and women will be able to perform physical tasks with the same conviction.
Hence, though it is true that physical differences limit what atsks women can perform physically, women have been able to push their limits further every generation and it would not be surprising to see women compete with men in pysical competitions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-02 | Mahima1902 | 54 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | Krisha Lakhani | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | Anish Sapkota | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | Anish Sapkota | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | DCAD123 | 50 | view |
- Manned space flight is costly and dangerous Moreover the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men an 74
- Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks 66
- Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 428, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Each
... genders became less and less prominent.Each gender could fit perfectly into a role ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 780, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a woman' or simply 'women'?
Suggestion: a woman; women
...k. It is also not surprising now to see a women in the gym, lifting weights that are as...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 782, Rule ID: WOMAN_WOMEN[1]
Message: 'woman' is the singular form of 'women'. Consider using 'woman'?
Suggestion: woman
... It is also not surprising now to see a women in the gym, lifting weights that are as...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 534, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a woman' or simply 'women'?
Suggestion: a woman; women
...h strength while most men are and hence a women would have to work a lot harder to achi...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 536, Rule ID: WOMAN_WOMEN[1]
Message: 'woman' is the singular form of 'women'. Consider using 'woman'?
Suggestion: woman
...strength while most men are and hence a women would have to work a lot harder to achi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, so, still, while, for example, in general, no doubt, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.5258426966 169% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2658.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 548.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8503649635 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83832613839 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5437327852 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450729927007 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 839.7 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.1974261561 60.3974514979 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.565217391 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8260869565 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78260869565 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.459848449757 0.243740707755 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143161207024 0.0831039109588 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108080669161 0.0758088955206 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28483102177 0.150359130593 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767602759191 0.0667264976115 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.