Author talks about a continuous discussion on equality between men and women in terms of tasks. To some extent, due to biological differences, women fail to achieve in some areas such as sports, administration and science. They expect women cannot be successful in muscles based sports, in manager positions or in scientific projects. In fact, I believe that nowadays this understanding has started to evolve in favor of women, there are many examples in which physical inheritance does not cause a disadvantage for women so they can be a very successful atlethic, engineer or manager.
Firstly, there is a prejudice that woman cannot be successful in muscle based sport such as weight, athletics and swimming. In contrast, we observe bunch of cases or championships around the world. For instance, Şahika Sayman, a Turkish diver, has broken the record in free diving with diving to 83 m. As we know, free diving is based on power of muscles in diaphram. Maybe when she failed while practicing, she could think that this was because of her weakness but instead she did not bound her dreams due to her sexuality and continued to practice more ambitiously. In fact, all such examples support that we can always improve ourselves' physical weaknesses by practicing. To sum, our achievements depend on how much you work for any task rather than suitability for it
Besides, the second argument is that woman cannot achieve to manage corporate firms, banks or instutitions. Nowadays, most Turkish banks has female managers such as İş Bank, Garanti Bank etc. Additionally, female managers can provide more friendly and cooperated working conditions rather than competition environment in contrast to people claim that woman can not get well-organized, act objectively and strategically because of emotional decisions shaped by our hormones.
Thirdly, there is classical judgement that positive science is suitable for male and social sciences are suitable for female. It is completely irrational to categorize someone’ mental ability due to physical abilities. I think this is rooted from local traditions so that families got used to force their daughters to be a primary school class teacher, sociologist or psychological consultant. We can see that again this idea has broken into pieces. For instance, in Turkey, a science project of a female high school student has got acceptance from NASA. This illustrate that woman has launched to focus more on analytical subjects and prove themselves in these fields locally and globally.
In conclusion, all these examples and angles show that physical inheritancs does not matter in doing any tasks when it comes to abilities of people, it is based on your determination, organization and mental development.
- "A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer." 50
- The way a message is delivered is often more important than the message itself. 66
- Luck plays more of a role in determining success than work ethic does. 87
- The following is an excerpt from a letter sent by the principal of Greenwood School to the parents of all incoming kindergartners."We have decided to institute a policy of all-day kindergarten, instead of half-day kindergarten, for all students at Greenwo 58
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society. 79
Essay evaluation report by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 769, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for any task rather than suitability for it Besides, the second argument is th...
^^
Line 9, column 480, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en into pieces. For instance, in Turkey, a science project of a female high schoo...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'well', 'while', 'for instance', 'i think', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'in fact', 'such as', 'in contrast to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.254545454545 0.240241500013 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.151515151515 0.157235817809 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0969696969697 0.0880659088768 110% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0525252525253 0.0497285424764 106% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0505050505051 0.0444667217837 114% => OK
Prepositions: 0.131313131313 0.12292977631 107% => OK
Participles: 0.0343434343434 0.0406280797675 85% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.03997469973 2.79330140395 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0323232323232 0.030933414821 104% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0505050505051 0.0997080785238 51% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0181818181818 0.0249443105267 73% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0121212121212 0.0148568991511 82% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2776.0 2732.02544248 102% => OK
No of words: 438.0 452.878318584 97% => OK
Chars per words: 6.33789954338 6.0361032391 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.399543378995 0.366273622748 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.305936073059 0.280924506359 109% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.22602739726 0.200843997647 113% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.159817351598 0.132149295362 121% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03997469973 2.79330140395 109% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 219.290929204 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586757990868 0.48968727796 120% => OK
Word variations: 72.3859120301 55.4138127331 131% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6194690265 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0526315789 23.380412469 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1463889893 59.4972553346 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.105263158 141.124799967 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0526315789 23.380412469 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.674092028746 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 53.6462388849 51.4728631049 104% => OK
Elegance: 1.65079365079 1.64882698954 100% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365399092646 0.391690518653 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0809729502356 0.123202303941 66% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0703654237669 0.077325440228 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.471721798235 0.547984918172 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.169672432476 0.149214159877 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117697036085 0.161403998019 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630124650203 0.0892212321368 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.249561187312 0.385218514788 65% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0402530587887 0.0692045440612 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216521965473 0.275328986314 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703842184402 0.0653680567796 108% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 7.22455752212 55% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 13.5995575221 74% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 769, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for any task rather than suitability for it Besides, the second argument is th...
^^
Line 9, column 480, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en into pieces. For instance, in Turkey, a science project of a female high schoo...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'well', 'while', 'for instance', 'i think', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'in fact', 'such as', 'in contrast to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.254545454545 0.240241500013 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.151515151515 0.157235817809 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0969696969697 0.0880659088768 110% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0525252525253 0.0497285424764 106% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0505050505051 0.0444667217837 114% => OK
Prepositions: 0.131313131313 0.12292977631 107% => OK
Participles: 0.0343434343434 0.0406280797675 85% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.03997469973 2.79330140395 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0323232323232 0.030933414821 104% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0505050505051 0.0997080785238 51% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0181818181818 0.0249443105267 73% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0121212121212 0.0148568991511 82% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2776.0 2732.02544248 102% => OK
No of words: 438.0 452.878318584 97% => OK
Chars per words: 6.33789954338 6.0361032391 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.399543378995 0.366273622748 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.305936073059 0.280924506359 109% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.22602739726 0.200843997647 113% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.159817351598 0.132149295362 121% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03997469973 2.79330140395 109% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 219.290929204 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586757990868 0.48968727796 120% => OK
Word variations: 72.3859120301 55.4138127331 131% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6194690265 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0526315789 23.380412469 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.1463889893 59.4972553346 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.105263158 141.124799967 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0526315789 23.380412469 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.674092028746 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 53.6462388849 51.4728631049 104% => OK
Elegance: 1.65079365079 1.64882698954 100% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365399092646 0.391690518653 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0809729502356 0.123202303941 66% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0703654237669 0.077325440228 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.471721798235 0.547984918172 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.169672432476 0.149214159877 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117697036085 0.161403998019 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630124650203 0.0892212321368 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.249561187312 0.385218514788 65% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0402530587887 0.0692045440612 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216521965473 0.275328986314 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703842184402 0.0653680567796 108% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.30420353982 113% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 7.22455752212 55% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 13.5995575221 74% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.