“Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to

Essay topics:

“Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.”

While in this day and age of the twenty-first century, there has been an explosion of opportunities for the new generation and the demographics of various occupations have changed with time, men and women are still not equally suited for many tasks due to their inherent physical differences. It is these physical differences between men and women which have a major role in the adeptness of one in a given field and hence dictates several decisions as a result of these.

The suitability of one for a specific task is definitely dependent on the physical abilities of the person in question. The above is clearly portrayed in the comparison of the demographic makeup - the ratio of the men to women employed - in various occupations. As an illustration, occupations such as construction are largely male-dominated because this task has a certain physical demand on the employees and hence women cannot undertake such jobs. Another job which clearly represents the inability of women to participate in are the emergency services such as firefighting. Firefighting depends a lot on the physical abilities of the employee and hence it is difficult for women to engage in such tasks. Both of these examples, outline the inability of women to perform certain tasks and hence these occupations are majorly male-dominated.

Another proof which again highlights the different physical requirements is the mining law in several countries where mining operations are carried out. Mining is a highly strenuous and demanding physical activity which needs its participants to be physically strong and fit. Hence, there has been legislature prohibiting the employment of women in mining fields as it is difficult for women to cope up with the dangerous tasks in question. This law has been based on solid empirical evidence that women are not suited to carry out such tasks and consequently it highlights the different needs of different occupations.

Just as women are not capable to carry out certain tasks due to their physical differences, men too are not able to complete certain other tasks as efficiently as women are capable of doing. For example, during the second world war, women were employed in great numbers by the military for carrying out tasks which needed a lot of precision and men were not as capable to carry out the tasks. These precision-based tasks such as assembling weapons and other artillery required a lot of precision and men were not as adept as the women in these tasks. Hence, this illustration again proves to us that women and men do have certain tasks which they are inherently better at performing and this is the way nature has built us human beings.

In conclusion, though men and women have the same DNA and differ by only a single chromosome, this difference of chromosome has huge implications in society around us. As illustrated in the examples above, there are certain occupations which need women to be present and certain occupations which need men. This is a definite result of the physical differences amongst men and women and we need to honour this.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-09 Sharanya Patnaik 58 view
2019-03-05 saharako 90 view
2018-07-22 arushigupta11 50 view
2018-03-04 Adarsh 54 view
2017-12-23 thembaguy 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user thembaguy :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, if, second, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2594.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 512.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06640625 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93642096665 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4296875 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 831.6 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.121197801 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.526315789 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9473684211 23.4991977007 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57894736842 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230418195863 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848702443081 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424820682386 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150914498648 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374401752364 0.0667264976115 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.