money spent on research is almost always a good investment, even when the results of that research are controversial.
I agree with the statement that it's worthwhile to spent money on research, it is just like well invested. The statement unnecessarily extends this word "controversial", as the research may get proper result or not, it must get some information about that particular topic of research.
As I agreed to the statement, research should not required to always get right result, it may get wrong or something worse also, but that leads us some more step to success. Research is also chief means by which we human attempt to satisfy our insatiable appetite for knowledge, and our craving to understand ourselves and the world around us. we can't illogically presume that we can know the result of research before we invest in it.
while we must invest in research irrespective of whether the results might be controversial, at the same time we should be circumspect about the research whose objectives are too vague and whose potential benefits are too speculative. After all, expensive research always carries significant opportunity coasts in terms of how the money should be provided toward addressing society's more immediate problem that do not required research.
secondly, for every new research breakthrough that helps reduce human suffering is another that serves primarily to add to that suffering. for example, while some might argue that physics researchers who harnessed the power of the atom have provided us with an alternative source of energy and invaluable "peace-keepers", this argument flies in the face of hundreds of thousands of innocent people murdered and maimed by atomic blast, and by nuclear melt down. In short, so called "advances" that scientific research has brought about often amount to net losses for humanity.
In sum, the assertion that we should invest in research whose results are "controversial" begs the question, because we can't know whether research will turn out controversial until we've invested in it. As for the broader assertion, i agree that money spent on research is generally a sound investment because it is an investment in the advancement of human knowledge and in human imagination and spirit.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-16 | Gaurav Singla | 66 | view |
| 2019-02-13 | todd | 62 | view |
| 2018-01-18 | Yash Shukla | 55 | view |
| 2016-09-07 | rrv9 | 79 | view |
| 2014-10-10 | s4ch009 | 30 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment complexto its manager."One month ago, all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towerscomplex were modified to restrict maximum water flow to one-t 50
- The following appeared in a letter from a firm providing investment advice to a client."Homes in the northeastern United States, where winters are typically cold, have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating. Last year that region experienc 66
- money spent on research is almost always a good investment even when the results of that research are controversial 79
- The following appeared in a memo to the board of directors of a company that specializes in the delivery of heating oil. "Most homes in the northeastern United States, where winters are typically cold, have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for h 50
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette."On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involv 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'require'
Suggestion: require
...d to the statement, research should not required to always get right result, it may get ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...d ourselves and the world around us. we cant illogically presume that we can know th...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
... of research before we invest in it. while we must invest in research irrespective...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...oblem that do not required research. secondly, for every new research breakthrough th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ves primarily to add to that suffering. for example, while some might argue that ph...
^^^
Line 9, column 131, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ial' begs the question, because we cant know whether research will turn out co...
^^^^
Line 9, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... begs the question, because we cant know whether research will turn out controver...
^^
Line 9, column 193, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: we've
...earch will turn out controversial until weve invested in it. As for the broader asse...
^^^^
Line 9, column 244, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ed in it. As for the broader assertion, i agree that money spent on research is g...
^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'well', 'while', 'after all', 'as for', 'for example', 'in short']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.215538847118 0.240241500013 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.152882205514 0.157235817809 97% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0877192982456 0.0880659088768 100% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0526315789474 0.0497285424764 106% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0551378446115 0.0444667217837 124% => OK
Prepositions: 0.137844611529 0.12292977631 112% => OK
Participles: 0.0250626566416 0.0406280797675 62% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.45153506765 2.79330140395 124% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0225563909774 0.030933414821 73% => OK
Particles: 0.00501253132832 0.0016655270985 301% => OK
Determiners: 0.077694235589 0.0997080785238 78% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0300751879699 0.0249443105267 121% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0225563909774 0.0148568991511 152% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2191.0 2732.02544248 80% => OK
No of words: 346.0 452.878318584 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.3323699422 6.0361032391 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.58838876751 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.372832369942 0.366273622748 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.28901734104 0.280924506359 103% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.231213872832 0.200843997647 115% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.156069364162 0.132149295362 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45153506765 2.79330140395 124% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 219.290929204 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575144508671 0.48968727796 117% => OK
Word variations: 64.6740634206 55.4138127331 117% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6194690265 58% => OK
Sentence length: 28.8333333333 23.380412469 123% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1427567961 59.4972553346 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 182.583333333 141.124799967 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8333333333 23.380412469 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.08333333333 0.674092028746 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.21349557522 173% => OK
Readability: 57.7350674374 51.4728631049 112% => OK
Elegance: 1.45192307692 1.64882698954 88% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391070118952 0.391690518653 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.144740727945 0.123202303941 117% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.091491917884 0.077325440228 118% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.638895106648 0.547984918172 117% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.120999142401 0.149214159877 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176155752788 0.161403998019 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705134878679 0.0892212321368 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.274016275822 0.385218514788 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.047808174998 0.0692045440612 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25945483094 0.275328986314 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710970576977 0.0653680567796 109% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.4325221239 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 9.0 13.5995575221 66% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.