The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth

the issue here brings us to a point where we have to debate between trends of youth and elder people, I agree that the best way to understand the culture of any generation is by analyzing it's youth trends.

As it is known that the major part of the population is youth so better look at that part of a group to know more about it, for example we differ generations based on the age groups, parents generation (i.e., ages 30-60) and children (i.e., ages 20-40) generation both are different, so if we want to know the current trends we better look at the younger generation that is from the ages 20- 40 years old (gen Z), it is often said that younger brains create the world so why can't we say that younger people represent the country/world. so it is best to analyze the trends of the youth if one want to understand the contemporary culture.

of course some people might argue that what about the older people, won't they represent the fashion/trends/culture. I would say that yes they also represent the culture only in certain circumstances that is if the people we are considering are adaptable and is always changing their fashion according to the new ways of the world, otherwise no we cannot consider fashion or culture of these people as they represent the culture of the generation before the contemporary or the current generation.

finally in conclusion one would say that it is more agreeable if one consider the trends of the youth to understand the contemporary culture better, rather than taking the culture of the wiser people.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the issue here brings us to a point where w...
^^^
Line 3, column 470, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... younger brains create the world so why cant we say that younger people represent th...
^^^^
Line 3, column 531, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...ger people represent the country/world. so it is best to analyze the trends of the...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Of
...understand the contemporary culture. of course some people might argue that wha...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
...temporary or the current generation. finally in conclusion one would say that it is ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: finally,
...temporary or the current generation. finally in conclusion one would say that it is ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, look, so, for example, in conclusion, of course

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1275.0 2235.4752809 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 272.0 442.535393258 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6875 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81174538127 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 215.323595506 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492647058824 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 704.065955056 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 20.2370786517 30% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 45.0 23.0359550562 195% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 152.671124389 60.3974514979 253% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 212.5 118.986275619 179% => OK
Words per sentence: 45.3333333333 23.4991977007 193% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.21951772744 211% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284358843603 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187246828501 0.0831039109588 225% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124424337175 0.0758088955206 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20531982464 0.150359130593 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0904463179712 0.0667264976115 136% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.3 14.1392134831 165% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 12.1743820225 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.81 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 100.480337079 34% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 28.5 11.8971910112 240% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 20.0 11.2143820225 178% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.