In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
In today's fast moving world imagination plays an incredible role for solving real world problems. I mostly agree with the prompt that knowledge is peripheral to imagination. It is of paramount importance to have a good imagination, which will in turn lead to higher creativity and innovation. Apart from this, theoretical knowledge can be limited, misleading or proven wrong in the coming future.
In today's sophisticated world is crucial to have a problem solving skills, no matter whatever the field, and this can be buttressed by inculcating a good innovative skills and out-of-the box thinking. As the technology is advancing, and the everyday the current solutions are being outmoded, thus to keep up with this advancement, it is indispensable to enhance our imagination and come up with new cutting-edge solutions, and drive the society forward. For instance, in past few decades Apple Inc. has contributed significantly in solving the computing problems, and providing solutions which seemed anachronistic in the earlier days. And, most on these innovations can be attributed to imagination and creativity of Steve Jobs, who single-handedly drove the industry forward. Having high speed internet, high resolution camera, touch screen and impeccable display which were unimaginable in earlier days seem quite trivial in contemporary world. Therefore, having a good imagination outcasts knowledge in solving the real world problems.
Moreover, theoretical knowledge, which seems profound today, might be incomplete or can be debunked by future observations. As the technological advancements might equip us with relevant tools and methods to solve the problems which can only be predicted today. For instance, our information about Black Holes is highly limited, and most of the research is based on conjectures and prediction. However, in future, if it is plausible to get the tangible experimental results from Black Holes itself, which might be antithetical to our current presumptions, and therefore, would lead to overturning the current research work. Similarly, a better way would be use imagination, and leave some room for error, even if our current observations seem irrefutable.
However, I also believe that to have a solid base for creativity and innovation, it is crucial to have an in-depth knowledge and information in that specific field. Learning about the past failures, as well as the loop holes in current research work would allow us to think differently in solving a specific problem.
Conclusively, I concede that knowledge gives us the right platform for solving a real world problem, but real work comes through having a good imagination, which would be helpful in innovation creativity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-16 | jenas | 68 | view |
| 2023-10-27 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-29 | nigarsafarova | 90 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | jayauen | 50 | view |
| 2023-04-28 | graybox | 66 | view |
- The following appeared in a health newsletter Nosinia is an herb that many users report to be as effective as prescription medications at fighting allergy symptoms Researchers recently compared Nosinia to a placebo in 95 men and women with seasonal allerg 75
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position you should co 83
- The following appeared in a memo from the new vice president of Sartorian a company that manufactures men s clothing Five years ago at a time when we had difficulty obtaining reliable supplies of high quality wool fabric we discontinued production of our 78
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society 62
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts Write a response in which you d 54
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...As the technology is advancing, and the everyday the current solutions are being outmode...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 404, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...on conjectures and prediction. However, in future, if it is plausible to get the tangible...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, therefore, thus, well, apart from, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2310.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 421.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48693586698 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17507813845 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541567695962 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 711.9 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1199772844 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.578947368 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1578947368 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15964153787 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575711995605 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042497921788 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956068281778 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427183007628 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...As the technology is advancing, and the everyday the current solutions are being outmode...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 404, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...on conjectures and prediction. However, in future, if it is plausible to get the tangible...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, therefore, thus, well, apart from, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2310.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 421.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48693586698 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17507813845 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541567695962 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 711.9 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1199772844 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.578947368 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1578947368 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15964153787 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575711995605 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042497921788 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956068281778 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427183007628 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.