National curriculum is one of the most controversial topics in a society. Some people believe that the governments should provide the same curriculum for whole students of a society. In this regard, students have the capability to compete in a fair atmosphere. Nonetheless, I believe that students should have different curriculum based on their capabilities and in what follows the most discernible reasons are drawn.
First and foremost, neither the inhabitants of major cities nor the residents of rural area are the same in different subjects such as, intelligence, hard-working, enthusiasm, economic situation and so forth. The fathers of city citizens hope their children to be as the same as they are, like, doctor, engineer, manager, etc. The need for these children is completely different to those who hope to have maximally diploma. The government should provide some distinctive program for those are more enthusiastic and this would help the whole society in the soon future. Indeed, they should be separated to deal more with math-for those who hope to be engineer- and natural science- for those who pursue to be doctor. Consequently, not all the residents of a country see education from the same angle and they should be divided on the basis of their dreams.
Moreover, for students who want to delve their horizon, easy courses would just give them a cold feet. Actually, since they can solve convoluted arithmetic riddles, whenever they see a common problem- for a long time-the tried to get accustomed with simple inquiries and would inevitably lose their creativity. However, by considering more specific courses and also mentors who would spend more time on these students, they would be able to participate in international competition and also prepared for future painstaking degrees. For instance, PHD is a degree that needs intelligent student and also there are only few students in each field. Hence, when the governments propose distinctive courses to liable students, they would also prepare them for future degree.
However, there are plenty of critics which complain about equality. In their eyes, people in a whole community should be in a same situation such as the same curriculum program, material, teachers and so forth. Moreover, teacher can circulate yearly between governmental and non-governmental schools to validate the same curriculum program. They always have premonition with a same metaphor which says'' people are create equal and should be in the same circumstances''. Therefore, the same curriculum for all students should be considered.
In conclusion, as the above-mentioned examples have illustrated, mostly, students should be separated regarding their intelligence, and also prospective. But there are some conservatives which explicate that student should be in the same environment.
- It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Governments should spend more money in support of arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. 76
- TPO 39 - Independent taskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO 05_ Integrated Writing 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'foot'?
Suggestion: foot
...asy courses would just give them a cold feet. Actually, since they can solve convolu...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, regarding, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2399.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 443.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41534988713 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00400668667 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501128668172 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 754.2 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5496307197 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.045454545 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1363636364 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95454545455 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231841932369 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834647879154 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661067656004 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146461435112 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06079843591 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.