Students shape the future of a nation. Growth of a nation is very much dependent on the quality education as well as the students. It is suggested that a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum untill they enter college. This recommendation does not look pragmatic because a student learn many skills, develope interest and pursue same to an extant, till he gets the admission in the college. Mandating all students to follow same national curriculum is not an ideal suggestion.
Each student has his own interest, skill set and talent to pursue his carrier in a specific domain. Many students would want to study science, arts or economics but if they are bound to study same curriculum, they may loose the interest in education. We have seen in past that many students show remarkable growth and interest in a specific domain which leads to great innovation and discoveries. If a person start working towards his interest in early age, he/she can do wonders for the nation.
There are many examples, where people have shown great skill or dedication in science, arts or even sports. Sachin Tendulkar is known as "God Of Cricket", he started his carrier in early age of 16. He was representing indian national cricket team and played so brilliantly. He played for the country for around 20 years and retired as a one of the great player of cricket. Mbappe is one of the emerging french footballer. He was just 19 year old when he helped his national team to win the football world cup. There are many other examples in all the fields where people has shown great potential to succeed in life. If we restrict them to study a national curriculum, it might impact their progress as a great acheiver in all the domains.
If the recommendation is reconsidered and made some changes, it can be followed then. For an instance, if we specify the age limit till which the curriculum should be followed, then it makes more sense. Instead of striclty following it till college, we can alter it to follow till particular standered, which makes it more feasible for all.
We have discussed many loopholes for the given recommendation and it clearly shows that this suggestion needs to be reconsidered. This is clearly not a bad suggestion but there should be more discussions, debate needed before concluding the same. If we adopt this as it is, it will create trouble for many students which would not be an ideal sign for any nation.
- Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet fer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning. 66
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the comp 77
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News:"The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg. Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions. Since they were declared 43
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...ound to study same curriculum, they may loose the interest in education. We have seen...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat many students show remarkable growth and interest in a specific domain which ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, so, then, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2059.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 427.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82201405152 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71356121858 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503512880562 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1990873559 60.3974514979 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.5217391304 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5652173913 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.21951772744 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375279151907 0.243740707755 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119236873945 0.0831039109588 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.195467795939 0.0758088955206 258% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214101422482 0.150359130593 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.213091176859 0.0667264976115 319% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.