A nation should require all of its students to study the
same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to
which you agree or disagree with the recommendation
and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In
developing and supporting your position, describe
specific circumstances in which adopting the
recommendation would or would not be advantageous
and explain how these examples shape your position.
The premise stated in the issue that 'a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college' on prima facie is an incorrect one. Stating that all the students study the same curriculum irrespective of their interests is not a very valid suggestion, as it doesn't encourage the individual likings of the students. Besides, how do we define the term 'national curriculum' and what would constitute in it is another point of contention.
Every student is unique. Every student has their own interests. Every student also has different mental and physical abilities to assimilate things. Some may be more interested in sciences while others may be more interested in the arts fields. Even science and arts are very broad fields; some students may be more into physics, chemistry, biology or something entirely different. Even the arts would have such bifurcations. Thus, asking all the students to study the same curriculum would mean that even if the students were not interested in a particular subject they would still have to study it and spend time doing it. Rather if this was not the case, the students could spend time on something that interested them more.
Also, not all students would have the ability to understand all the different subjects included in the curriculum. Someone with an inclination towards arts might find it extremely difficult to understand the various math theorems or physics laws. On the other hand, someone with liking to science might have no interest in painting or playing an instrument. For all these students, forcing them to study a standardized national curriculum would not be beneficial. The students should be encouraged from an early age to cultivate their interests and work towards them so that they can have a solid foundation, which could result in a successful career in the future.
However, just like a coin has two sides there can be another point of view to this premise. There can be students who might not be aware of their interests or might be confused about what field they should choose. For such students, it makes sense to a certain extent to have the same curriculum since it would mean that these students would get exposed to a variety of subjects at the very start of their educational life and hence would get a chance to choose their fields. Having the same curriculum would mean that they are exposed to different subjects and hence can explore these subjects to finally narrow down on their field of interests.
Thus to conclude, have the same standardized national curriculum for the students and asking all of them to study it isn't the best possible recommendation. Students would already have their fields of interest should be encouraged to pursue the same since the start, whereas others could be given an opportunity to decide based on the curriculum. However, asking all the students to go through the same process would not be the most efficient process to follow.
- A nation should require all of its students to study thesame national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent towhich you agree or disagree with the recommendationand explain your reasoning for the position you 58
- The following is a memorandum from the businessmanager of a television station.“Over the past year, our late-night news program hasdevoted increased time to national news and less timeto weather and local news. During this time period,most of the compla 55
- All too often, companies hire outside consultantsto suggest ways for the company to operate moreefficiently. If companies were to spend more timelistening to their own employees, such consultantswould be unnecessary.Write a response in which you discuss t 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 307, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...s is not a very valid suggestion, as it doesnt encourage the individual likings of the...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 65, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... Every student has their own interests. Every student also has different mental and p...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 626, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...ve to study it and spend time doing it. Rather if this was not the case, the students ...
^^^^^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... down on their field of interests. Thus to conclude, have the same standardized...
^^^^
Line 17, column 118, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ents and asking all of them to study it isnt the best possible recommendation. Stude...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, hence, however, if, may, so, still, thus, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 30.0 12.4196629213 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2506.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 502.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99203187251 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7334296765 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63157287394 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.438247011952 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 776.7 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0723270439 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.956521739 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8260869565 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30434782609 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175812347586 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065041765017 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667811813448 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12792172851 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063809716481 0.0667264976115 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.