Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
With the fervent modernization of our world, the action of humans have had patently detrimental effects on our planet. In order to prevent the exacerbation of these effects in the future, I agree that nations should pass laws in order to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state. Although these areas could be developed for economic gain, I believe as a nation we should be assiduous in our fight to preserve what is left of our home’s natural state.
The wilderness of our magnificent planet is breathtaking; it represents beauty and freedom. From hummingbirds dashing from flower to flower to the common deer roaming the forest, many extraordinary creatures call the wilderness home and have inhabited these environments since long before humans established dominance. Even before Lewis and Clark settled in America and were fascinated by the scintillating beauty of their new home, the Native Americans had been awestruck by the florid wonder of nature for decades. Although much of our world has become modernized, many still share veneration and love for nature and the wilderness, untouched from the ever-expanding hand of economic development. Vast plains and cavernous mountains offer an escape from the modern world unlike anything else, and many share the view that these natural works of art should be protected.
While there are certainly those who selfishly feel that the wilderness should be preserved in its natural state for their own benefit, most argue that nature must be shielded from economic development also to protect the flora and fauna that reside there. While humans are able to speak for themselves, the plants and animals of the wilderness do not have a voice. They cannot demur the detriment of their home; they cannot assist in the effort to protect it. I, along with many others, feel it is our moral obligation as humans to stand up for those who cannot do so for themselves. This includes those who call the wilderness their home.
There are several poor consequences that would occur as a result of the development of urban neighborhoods and shops in wild areas. The main outcome of such development would be the loss of habitat of the creatures that reside in these environments. This is an acute effect of construction and advancement into unclaimed environments that is often overlooked. Another consequence of development in areas that are currently devoted to nature is that those regions would no longer be available for outdoor enjoyment; avid outdoor adventurers would no longer be able to utilize those areas for activities such as hiking, fishing, or even nature walks, with the simple goal of appreciating its beauty.
Ultimately, I strongly support the speaker’s claim that we, as a nation, must strive to protect the remaining wilderness areas of our planet in their natural habitat, even if development of these regions would further the economic interests of some.
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting you 66
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state even if these areas could be developed for economic gain Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 83
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of student housing at Buckingham College To serve the housing needs of our students Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories Buckingham s enrollment is growing and based on current tren 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'flower to'.
Suggestion: flower to
...freedom. From hummingbirds dashing from flower to flower to the common deer roaming the forest, man...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 800, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun share seems to be countable; consider using: 'many shares'.
Suggestion: many shares
... modern world unlike anything else, and many share the view that these natural works of ar...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, still, while, as for, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 33.0505617978 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2477.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 479.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17118997912 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81833913226 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509394572025 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 781.2 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.4256196707 60.3974514979 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.611111111 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6111111111 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345145357103 0.243740707755 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104457483056 0.0831039109588 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0980351870043 0.0758088955206 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203528362746 0.150359130593 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0766005702837 0.0667264976115 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.