Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Nature is the reason people are living today. Prompt states that nation should pass law to preserve any remaining wilderness area in their natural state, even if that area can be use for development for economic gain. In my not so humble opinion, I mostly agree with the prompt that nation should pass the law to preserve wilderness areas for following reason.
To begin with, as the glob is developing nations are flourishing with modern and economic growth people are benighted nature. In the race of development people are cutting down the trees which lead to contracting the size of wilderness areas. Due to this many animals are getting extinct. For example, as many forests are been cut down for development many wild animals like tiger, lion, puma, Black Panther are getting extinct from the globe. Due to this development activity many animals has been already extinct. Even this is affecting birds as they are getting homeless and dying due to it.
Moreover, as wilderness areas are getting cut for developments large number of trees are being cut which is increasing global warming and it is blatant that due to increase in global warming it is affecting everyone. As global warming increases temperature of the earth increases and due to it ice on the polls is melting rapidly due to it arctic animals are getting extinct. For instance, as temperature of earth is increasing ice at the poles are melting and due to it polar bears, dears, penguins etc are dying as they need cold climate to survey.
Finally, due to cutting down the trees oxygen level in the atmosphere is getting reduced each day and population of livings are increasing day by day. Due to this end of the earth will come soon. To stop this we need to safe more numbers of trees and preserve wilderness areas. Due to cutting down of trees many wild animals are getting into populated areas creating chaos among the people. For example, it has been shown many times on the TV that wild animal is spotted on the streets this is happening because animals don’t have sufficient place to live so they are getting out of the forest in search of food, water and shelter.
In conclusion, wilderness areas are more important than economic gain for a nation. So nations should pass law to preserve any remaining wilderness area in their natural state, even if this area could be developed for economic gain.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 34, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'trees'' or 'tree's'?
Suggestion: trees'; tree's
...y. Finally, due to cutting down the trees oxygen level in the atmosphere is getti...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 633, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t in search of food, water and shelter. In conclusion, wilderness areas are more...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a could be developed for economic gain.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, moreover, so, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1981.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 411.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8199513382 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4531653548 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.445255474453 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.9 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3814273297 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.263157895 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6315789474 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73684210526 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324853852886 0.243740707755 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124988057866 0.0831039109588 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.178516939054 0.0758088955206 235% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264764722227 0.150359130593 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.23291970269 0.0667264976115 349% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.