All parents should be required to volunteer time to their children's schools.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Giving time for children is said to be a good parenting. Study has shown that those children who grow up more in their parents company tend to walk on right path than those who stay less with parents or stay away from parents for long time. I think all parents should volunteer time to their children’s school. This will help parents to keep track of their child.
Firstly, giving or spending some time on children’s school parents will see where and how their child is studying. In which environment their child is growing and they will be sure about his/her education. For example, if child is studying is a school where there is a club or bad reputed collage nearby than it is quite oblivious that child is not studying in a good environment. It may lead to bad habits when that child grew up and parents will only come to know about this when they volunteer time to their children’s school.
Secondly, when parents volunteer time to their children’s school they can keep the track of his or her study. When parents keep track of their child’s education than child also get motivated to study better and show his parents better results. For example, if a child is performing low in his academic than and if he/she is aware that his/her parents are volunteering their time to his school, than to impress them he/she will study hard and try to get good grades which will eventually improve his/her academic performance. This will lead to bright feature of that child.
Finally, volunteering time to a child’s school will bring satisfaction to parents that they are raising their child in good manner. They will able to keep their children’s away from bad habits such as drinking, smoking, drugs etc because this are some stuff which can spoil several lives. For example, if child is in bad company who support illegal stuff than his/her parents can immediately take strict action and bring his/her life on track. This is only possible if parents are volunteering their time to their children’s school.
In conclusion, I strongly support that parents should volunteer their time to their children’s school. Which will leads to children’s bright feature.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 428, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...school, than to impress them he/she will study hard and try to get good grades wh...
^^
Line 9, column 104, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... their time to their children’s school. Which will leads to children’s bright feature...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill leads to children’s bright feature.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 33.0505617978 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1822.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 370.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92432432432 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52299866806 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.416216216216 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 503.1 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9675569118 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.222222222 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22581844523 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114739035974 0.0831039109588 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730800194927 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183072473191 0.150359130593 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0523777136264 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 48.8420337079 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.68 8.38706741573 80% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 100.480337079 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.