Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Issues bothering on, the use and misuse of forest has been a major global topic for some time now. There are proponents, that say, deforestation would lead to more global warming, but they forget global warming can be solved other ways. Governments should develop forests for economic gains.
The biggest processing companies in a country like Nigeria, racks in millions of Naira yearly, and this improves the foreign exchange of the country. Most of these companies are located far away from the public and require vast expanse of land. These companies were given just a little expanse of land for their work. Imagine, how these companies would improve economic gain when they are allowed to expand. Leaving these forests would cause the country more harm because there would be economic problems and this would affect mainly the poor in the country.
Futhermore, Nigeria have large expanse of forest but sadly this has helped increase the security problems in the country. Kidnappers in the country use these forest has a hiding place for their selves. Sadly, this is also the case for many other developing nation. The government cutting down the forest would solve the security issue. Foreign investors that have avoided investing in the country would come back, because they would become confident of the security of the nation. This would cause the country to gain more economically.
Again, these forests mainly have trees that do not offer much for the improvement of the country and they can be cut down for the use of agriculture. Recently, Nigeria has given out large expanse of land to poor farmers from forest and this move has led to improvement of the economy from agriculture.
It is not really, necessary, to leave forest in the nation to solve global warming. The government can cut down the irrelevant trees in their country and plant more economic trees and flowers in those areas. Some trees and flowers are the major source of revenues for countries like Taiwan and so developing the area would solve two problems: Global warming and Economy.
In conclusion, there are so many benefits for the economy of a country by converting the forest for use economically. Developing forest areas would solve not just security issues but also global warming and give economic gain to any country directly aor indirectly. It is therefore, more gain, for the government to develop forests for economic use.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | wenki31 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | Md. Kawsar Ahmed | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | chapagain08 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | KarinaShine | 83 | view |
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 54
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 50
- "True beauty is found not in the exceptional but in the common place"Write an essay in which you take a position on the statement above. In developing and supporting your essay consider instances in which the statement does not hold true 58
- "True beauty is found not in the exceptional but in the common place"Write an essay in which you take a position on the statement above. In developing and supporting your essay consider instances in which the statement does not hold true. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 338, Rule ID: ECONOMIC_ECONOMICAL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economical' (=affordable, cheap)?
Suggestion: economical
...r the government to develop forests for economic use.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, really, so, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2030.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 402.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04975124378 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43982174153 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.432835820896 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 646.2 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2557656032 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.2727272727 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2727272727 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.13636363636 5.21951772744 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168444791032 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680219628979 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583710556096 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10769642952 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422376577355 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.