Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The author, supports respect for pairs, is more important than sound moral judgment. Maintaining respect for pairs is very important in leadership but it is not as effective, as sound moral judgment for succes in leadership. I say this considering two reasons, which i would list below.
The leader, requires to be able to commuinicate is ideas effectively to his peers. In a case where the leader lacks sound moral judgement, he won't be taken seriously. The people would not trust to follow him, because he lacks in moral standing. For example, it is difficult for a leader that steals public funds to communicate the need for financial integrity to his peers. Well, the leader might have been able to maintain respect for his peers, but would he get the same respect in return? Certainly, No. A leader cannot communicate relevant ideas easily, if he lacks respect from his peers. He would be taken for granted, as he does not command sound moral jugdmnet.
Goals. A leader, that lacks in moral standing cannot achieve the set goals of the organisation he leads. I said, earlier, a leader that cannot communicate ideas cannot be respected. In turn, this would make achievement of goals difficult. For example, a political leader that has lofty economic goals for the country, would struggle to achieve it. This is because, he might be lacking in financial integrity and this would ste a bad example for his peers to follow, Therefore, the economy of the country would be in danger.
Sometimes, maintaining respect for peers trascends to succes in leadership. And this happens, when leading people who are older than the leader. This example, can be found in Africa, where age respect is very relevant to maintain a good relationship with elders.
In conclusion, respect is an important factor in leadership. Whether it is given or earned, but earning respect through sound moral jugdment is more important for an effective leader.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | arpit6798 | 79 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 50
- "True beauty is found not in the exceptional but in the common place"Write an essay in which you take a position on the statement above. In developing and supporting your essay consider instances in which the statement does not hold true 58
- "True beauty is found not in the exceptional but in the common place"Write an essay in which you take a position on the statement above. In developing and supporting your essay consider instances in which the statement does not hold true. 58
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...say this considering two reasons, which i would list below. The leader, requ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1628.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 324.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02469135802 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69613914434 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475308641975 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9006270837 60.3974514979 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.4 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246917075311 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949165456159 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686905902746 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169679872007 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0896241727209 0.0667264976115 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.1392134831 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.