Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.
The issue reminds about Nero emperor's act of playing the fiddle while Rome was burning. How can the government be indulged in the development of arts when the majority of its people are suffering? It is an indication of government’s apathy towards its people. Therefore it is paramount that more priority in funding should be given for the uplifting of hungry and unemployed population than for arts.
A country's wellbeing and success are dependent upon the well-being and success of its citizens. When the citizens are employed, they will be well fed and happy. What if the country is floundering with poverty and unemployment? These two conditions will lead to social instability i.e., more robbery; criminal offenses in small scale and political instability at scale in large. These could ultimately cause the eruption of civil war and geopolitical issues at the international level. Examples in today's world include are similar to what is happening in the countries like Syria, Egypt, etc.
Art in general mainly serves the upper middle class and upper class of the society. Take the example of any form of art like music, drama, etc. These two class people are well fed and employed in general. On the other hand, who will have time to think about art for entertainment when one is deprived of food and employment? In such cases, the government spending should be diverted towards improvisation schemes which will provide employment. When the citizens are employed it is eventually going to improve the economy of the nation.
It must be acknowledged here it is not only the responsibility of own country's government. The International community should also minimize the collaborative works related to arts and lend a supporting hand in improving the standard of living of the citizens.
Finally, care and concern should be focused on the well-being of the citizens and everything comes second when it comes to the government's responsibility. Art can be nurtured and developed at any stage but human resource worth a generation is not.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Himanshu Sharma | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | Himanshu Sharma | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | AC1990 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | renmingliu | 66 | view |
- Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed. 58
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions. 50
- Education should be equally devoted to enriching the personal lives of students and to training students to be productive workers 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...nment's apathy towards its people. Therefore it is paramount that more priority in f...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... schemes which will provide employment. When the citizens are employed it is eventua...
^^^^
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...thing comes second when it comes to the governments responsibility. Art can be nurtured and...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'in general', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.265582655827 0.240241500013 111% => OK
Verbs: 0.151761517615 0.157235817809 97% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0813008130081 0.0880659088768 92% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0325203252033 0.0497285424764 65% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0271002710027 0.0444667217837 61% => OK
Prepositions: 0.124661246612 0.12292977631 101% => OK
Participles: 0.0569105691057 0.0406280797675 140% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.96896548825 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0162601626016 0.030933414821 53% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.10027100271 0.0997080785238 101% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0325203252033 0.0249443105267 130% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0271002710027 0.0148568991511 182% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2048.0 2732.02544248 75% => OK
No of words: 335.0 452.878318584 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.11343283582 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.58838876751 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.361194029851 0.366273622748 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.286567164179 0.280924506359 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.220895522388 0.200843997647 110% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.140298507463 0.132149295362 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96896548825 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 219.290929204 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570149253731 0.48968727796 116% => OK
Word variations: 63.0273430915 55.4138127331 114% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.75 23.380412469 72% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6411124962 59.4972553346 53% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.4 141.124799967 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 23.380412469 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.55 0.674092028746 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 45.4067164179 51.4728631049 88% => OK
Elegance: 2.11538461538 1.64882698954 128% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299396118935 0.391690518653 76% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0876915539397 0.123202303941 71% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0687738958577 0.077325440228 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.520159207202 0.547984918172 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.122718802963 0.149214159877 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117290772206 0.161403998019 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788328250993 0.0892212321368 88% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.393230520489 0.385218514788 102% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0569976869201 0.0692045440612 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209183032095 0.275328986314 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744309410072 0.0653680567796 114% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.