No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and
experience to that field of study
The advancement of any field of study say medical, engineering, etc require knowledge and experience of people. A single field itself consists of vast number of sub-fields which contribute to the advancement of that field. Different people having specific knowledge and experience play a crucial role in the advancement. However, knowledge and experience is the key of advancement and not the people's origin whether they are outsider or insider.
The field of integrated electronics has seen a tremendous advancement in last 2 decades due to valuable contributions from great people. Starting from John kilby inventing first transistor, Gordon moore giving an unprecedented idea to reduce chip size and Bob Widlar making novel breakthroughs in analog circuit, all have played a key role in advancement of electronics field. The interesting fact is that all these people are from USA and no outsider was involved. Even now world is reaping the advancements made by these gentlemen, showing what matters is knowledge and experience and not outsider. Also there can be some field of study that is related to one country only and doesn't involve any outsider. The field of law for a country is specific thing for that country. The lawmakers may not need any outsider to involve and share their knowledge as law for a country is related to traditions, mentality, ethnicity and religion of the populations residing there.
However, this huge world consists of a large number of diverse populations. Different people studying a particular field brings diversity of opinions in that field. For eg- The field of history, different countries have different histories which makes us learn diverse things. Indian late medieval history teaches us that remiss our work and indulging in luxury can bring downfall of an empire. History of hitler shows that how a single man can influence a large mass and lead with courage and commitment, an excellent example of leader. Here, outsider i.e. German historian's knowledge and experience has advanced the field of history. There are many examples like this that show how outsider knowledge contributes in advancement of a field.
Advancement in field of study can be brought by outsider but term "always" is bit extreme as we have seen in some examples. Also, involvement of an outsider in a certain field depend on field also. However, there are high chances that if more people are working in a certain field then diverse ideas and dissemination of new ideas will come.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-21 | rabin_poudyal | 66 | view |
| 2019-01-23 | shouvik ash | 66 | view |
| 2018-11-13 | leilasafari | 66 | view |
| 2016-07-28 | ujjwalkrpl | 50 | view |
- 'Moderation in all things' is ill-considered advice. Rather, one should say, 'Moderation in mostthings,' since many areas of human concern require or at least profit from intense focus' 45
- The material progress and well-being of one country are necessarily connected to thematerial progress and well-being of all other countries 50
- Success, whether academic or professional, involves an ability to survive in a newenvironment and--, eventually, --to change it 62
- 'Moderation in all things' is ill-considered advice. Rather, one should say, 'Moderation in mostthings,' since many areas of human concern require or at least profit from intense focus 50
- No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge andexperience to that field of study 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 394, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...e is the key of advancement and not the peoples origin whether they are outsider or ins...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 602, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...wledge and experience and not outsider. Also there can be some field of study that i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 680, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...that is related to one country only and doesnt involve any outsider. The field of law ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 38, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... However, this huge world consists of a large number of diverse populations. Different people s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 566, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'historians'' or 'historian's'?
Suggestion: historians'; historian's
...e of leader. Here, outsider i.e. German historians knowledge and experience has advanced t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 89, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'bitten'.
Suggestion: bitten
...outsider but term 'always' is bit extreme as we have seen in some example...
^^^
Line 7, column 203, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ider in a certain field depend on field also. However, there are high chances that i...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'then']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.296213808463 0.240241500013 123% => OK
Verbs: 0.138084632517 0.157235817809 88% => OK
Adjectives: 0.104677060134 0.0880659088768 119% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0378619153675 0.0497285424764 76% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0155902004454 0.0444667217837 35% => OK
Prepositions: 0.120267260579 0.12292977631 98% => OK
Participles: 0.0445434298441 0.0406280797675 110% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.93052112216 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0133630289532 0.030933414821 43% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.097995545657 0.0997080785238 98% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0133630289532 0.0249443105267 54% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0178173719376 0.0148568991511 120% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2518.0 2732.02544248 92% => OK
No of words: 407.0 452.878318584 90% => OK
Chars per words: 6.18673218673 6.0361032391 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.385749385749 0.366273622748 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.309582309582 0.280924506359 110% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.226044226044 0.200843997647 113% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.152334152334 0.132149295362 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93052112216 2.79330140395 105% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 219.290929204 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523341523342 0.48968727796 107% => OK
Word variations: 58.7132681315 55.4138127331 106% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6194690265 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.5 23.380412469 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9575302174 59.4972553346 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.454545455 141.124799967 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 23.380412469 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.363636363636 0.674092028746 54% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.21349557522 134% => OK
Readability: 49.4582309582 51.4728631049 96% => OK
Elegance: 2.40697674419 1.64882698954 146% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361474569277 0.391690518653 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.125145288975 0.123202303941 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0749242244426 0.077325440228 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.495809433609 0.547984918172 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.128086358429 0.149214159877 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14369464713 0.161403998019 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861428963843 0.0892212321368 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.401193733105 0.385218514788 104% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.063708901399 0.0692045440612 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2642461553 0.275328986314 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317794419077 0.0653680567796 49% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.4325221239 125% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.30420353982 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88274336283 184% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 11.0 7.22455752212 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 3.66592920354 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 7.0 2.70907079646 258% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.5995575221 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.