In order to improve the quality of instruction at the college and university level, all of the faculty should be required to spend time working outside of the academic world in the professions relevant to the courses they teach.
In the statement the author asserts that for improving the instruction, all the faculties must have to spend time working outside the academic world. I totally agree with author assertion. the reasons to substantiated my viewpoint are elaborate upon hereunder.
First of all, I think in this progressive and sophisticated world where we live by each passing day, technology as well as the working methods are change. Therefore, faculties have to update their knowledge by the new technologies and how they used in practical. I never could forget professor Kalate. He was one of the oldest professors that I ever seen. He was too strict on the old fashion methods which we never could see in practical and his classes were one of the worst class that I took during my bachelor. Besides he enervating and spending students time.
Second, faculties are the persons who educate the next generations, so if they could understand concepts in practical and use, they will better could explain it to students. For example, in my hydraulic structure course, I pleased to illustrate cavitation phenomenon to the high schooler students. At first, I read lots of articles, papers and books about it. However, I couldn’t grasp to it in the best way. I went to Hydraulic lab and ask lab stuff to illustrate it to myself. I never could forge the time that I see the bubbles and hear how they pops. He said in the large-scale and during times this phenomenon occurs damage in hydraulic structures. I deeply understand it and it the open house day, every one loved my explanation. It was the time that I understand, if the presenter completely figures out concept in practical and in the real world, her/his student will understand it as well.
Last, the class will be more attractive, if faculty members spend a little time out of the academic world. As they would full of experiments and stories from the problems that a phlegmatic worker could face with it. Professor Barghian was one of the outstanding professors in the bridge engineering in my city. He engaged about twelve-year in the construction of lots of bridges. I remember most of the student enjoyed his class, as he said about the probable problems that an engineer could face with them in every part of the bridge construction. We fully concentrate to his words. I could say I can imagine myself in the construction field, therefore. I could easily understand the various parts of the bridges, where an engineer has to take care more, and how could solve the problems during the construction.
In sum, taking aforementioned reasons and examples into account, I totally agree with the author and I believe that all of the universities should account on their faculties work experiment as well as knowledges.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... I totally agree with author assertion. the reasons to substantiated my viewpoint a...
^^^
Line 3, column 527, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'enervates'.
Suggestion: enervates
...t I took during my bachelor. Besides he enervating and spending students time. Second, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 556, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'pop'
Suggestion: pop
...hat I see the bubbles and hear how they pops. He said in the large-scale and during ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 117, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...gree with the author and I believe that all of the universities should account on their fa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... work experiment as well as knowledges.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, i think, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 67.0 33.0505617978 203% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2304.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 468.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92307692308 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88358243614 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504273504274 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 706.5 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 21.0 6.24550561798 336% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.8257167616 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3333333333 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166532730352 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422578281534 0.0831039109588 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697881128285 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109452682205 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503799780847 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.