People rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of human to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. Write a respond in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f

Nowadays, people are relying on technology to solve their problems. Technology itself is a result of advanced thinking. So, I disagree with the statement. Though there are some disadvantages of technology advancement, It is not right to say that human ability to think will deteriorate.

Let us take some examples. In earlier days, people used manual techniques to calculate which was time-consuming. A calculator is a gift of technology. But even calculators are outdated these days and we can do all those calculations in seconds from our mobile phones or computers. This example states that people always wanted new ways and their thinking is leading them towards innovation of new technology. So, technology itself is a result of human thinking.

Technology will be beneficial or maleficient that depends on the usage of that technology. Also in which directions they are thinking. A problem of distance was solved by the arrival of vehicles. It created another problem to the environment by fuel combustion. And nowadays, organizations are thinking towards those problems and created vehicles that run from solar energy or electricity etc which are not harmful to the environment. But, that might also have some disadvantages, which will lead us to think towards a solution and innovation of new technology.

In sum, Thinking of human being will be enhanced by technology advancements which will lead us to a new world. I disagree with the statement.

Votes
Average: 3.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 58.6224719101 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1231.0 2235.4752809 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 234.0 442.535393258 53% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26068376068 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.55969084622 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1315456686 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 215.323595506 59% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542735042735 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 704.065955056 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1529036242 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.3888888889 118.986275619 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.0 23.4991977007 55% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.38888888889 5.21951772744 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244589458102 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831410552085 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692252896215 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177955835506 0.150359130593 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832350655245 0.0667264976115 125% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 48.8420337079 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.34 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 100.480337079 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.

Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.