The paragraph revolves around predictions and assumptions about the headache issue in residents of Mentia. The predictions are based on sufficiently long time period i.e twenty years, which might be sufficient in terms of accuracy. Still, concise reading creates some questions. The statement seems partially convincing and the author should mention more details to affirm the conclusion.
As per the aspect of the author, salicylates are the components which soothe a headache and with high consumptions of the same, the ratio of people having a headache will decrease in Mentia. To support his/her assumption, he/she mentioned several examples like the presence of Salicylates in naturally available food, in food preservatives and food flavors which placated a headache. With mentioned examples, it seems convincing and we can accept the conclusion that people of mentia will suffer less due to a headache.
The first question arises here is that the number of people examined during the study and their biological details. It is possible here that the number of people examined is 10 from the total population of 1,00,000. Also, the biological presence of salicylates and their food habits affects the conclusion. If examined people have sufficient rate of salicylates, then it is obvious that they will suffer less from a headache. Also, if selected people have less intensity of a headache compared to overall population, the conclusion will be proven wrong.
Another reason why the prediction seems skeptical is the side effects of salicylates and consumption ratio. Salicylates are good for ameliorating headache, but, people might suffer from other problems. Thus, the author should mention here other problems that people face after consuming salicylates. Salicylates have existed in natural resources and food processing companies also use it as food preservatives. Further, the author is suggesting to use it in food flavors to reduce a ratio of a headache. But, how much salicylates is required to maintain good health and reduce headache problem is also not mentioned here. People might face more problem due to high consumption of salicylates or it may not affect due to high consumption.
Thus, examining carefully, the conclusion seems skeptical and it should not be predicted that residents of Mentia will suffer fewer headache in the future.
- Nowadays many children are playing computer games instead of doing sports activities Why is it happening Is it a negative or positive development 78
- "We recommend that Monarch Books open a café in its store. Monarch, having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years, has a large customer base because it is known for its wide selection of books on all subjects. Clearly, opening t 30
- GRE Argument:The following appeared in a memo from the mayor of Brindleburg to the city council."Two years ago, the town of Seaside Vista opened a new municipal golf course and resort hotel. Since then, the Seaside Vista Tourism Board has reported a 20% i 12
- Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty.W 50
- The following appeared in a memo at XYZ company."When XYZ lays off employees, it pays Delany Personnel Firm to offer those employees assistance in creating résumés and developing interviewing skills, if they so desire. Laid-off employees have benefited 23
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 514, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... reduce a ratio of a headache. But, how much salicylates is required to maintain goo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, still, then, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2003.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 370.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41351351351 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91049961949 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481081081081 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3330713048 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.15 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.21951772744 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160661553649 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515583503574 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380956504595 0.0758088955206 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0944073450149 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177916018237 0.0667264976115 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.