As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.

Essay topics:

As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.

In today's fast-paced world we are quite well acquainted with the idea of technology. People belonging to various age groups make use of smartphones, smart TVs, microwaves and the works. This age could be termed as the "smart age".What we do not realize is how dependent we have become on these devices which were once not available to the average person. This put the thought up for debate whether this dependence is detrimental to our intellect. No doubt, that using technology has made our life so easy that we do not have to rack our brains against problems that once required hours of efforts and thinking, but terming this as a source of "deterioration to our intellect" would be too strong a phase.

Calculators have become a common instrument used in work and studying. Before they were invented, people calculated major mathematical queries by hand. After the development of the hand held devices, people can now concentrate on tasks that require more of their attention. For example a cashier no longer has to keep adding or subtracting the amount debited or credited by hand and has made it easier for him to concentrate on bigger problems like how the stock has to managed.This reduces the error that he could have made if he had done them manually. This does not necessarily mean that his thinking capability has decreased, rather he can focus on critical problems.

The invention of the airplane is another such example. The main thought process of the Wright brothers behind the building of the world's first airplane was to create an instrument that could fly as well as carry people in it for a large distance. Over the years, as the mechanisms improved, the major question remained about how the design of the plane could be ameliorated to ensure safety of its passengers. This led to scientists to put in efforts and bring about changes that would prove to a major development in aeronautics.
Technology advancements and its frailty go hand in hand. In the recent issue of the major data leak of Facebook, Mark Zuckerburg was faced with a massive problem at hand. Data of billions of people who had an account on the social media platform was leaked.This data could be accessed by unauthorized people and posed as a major threat to privacy. Zuckerburg along with his team and creative workers came up with measures that could solve this issue. If not for this social media, humans would not have been exposed to such a kind of problem. When such problems surface, humans are compelled to take steps to think and to create their corresponding solutions.

In conclusion, these examples weaken the argument that just because humans have started to rely more on technology and life has become easier in some aspects, humans will lose their ability to think for themselves. This can be said because the more technology advances, more are we exposed to newer problems that would not arise if such advancements had never been made.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-29 tarun9927 50 view
2020-01-22 pranav_kanth 50 view
2020-01-19 vivek2upad 66 view
2020-01-17 sefeliz 58 view
2020-01-13 jason123 54 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user MallikaS :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: What
... be termed as the 'smart age'.What we do not realize is how dependent we h...
^^^^
Line 3, column 479, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...blems like how the stock has to managed.This reduces the error that he could have ma...
^^^^
Line 6, column 257, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...on the social media platform was leaked.This data could be accessed by unauthorized ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, kind of, no doubt, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2470.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 503.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91053677932 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78667645266 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520874751491 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 771.3 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.3860733392 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.272727273 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8636363636 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09090909091 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195574407182 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517342225732 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685557471489 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118344130466 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107019348053 0.0667264976115 160% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.