People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and suppo

Essay topics:

People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

The behavior of an individual is closely linked to the environment in which he lives. This includes the kind of people he interacts with on a daily basis. It also depends upon his past endeavors and experiences. Sometimes even the kind of job he does plays a major role in shaping of one's behavioral as well as thinking patterns.

To further elaborate, consider an example of John who is naturally sensitive by nature. He tends to be more emotional than the majority of friends that he is surrounded with. If the majority John's friends a group of thieves, it is very likely that that he too will be swayed towards stealing which was against his nature in the first place. Instead, is John had been friends with a group of scholars, he would likely would be inclined towards pursuing a degree. This perfectly demonstrates the saying " A man is known by the company he keeps".

Moreover, the kind of surrounding a person is born in also affects how he grows up as an individual. A child that is born in a house which is prone to domestic violence towards the mother by the father, the child grows up to be traumatized by every male figure that he encounters. It might be arduous for the child to interact with a male figure later in his life too. On the other hand, the same child could think that the kind of behaviors that the father portrays is correct an ill-treating one's spouse is natural. This dogma can affect his or her own relationships.

But it might not always be the case with every individual, as each human being is wired differently. If a person has a strong sense of conscience and self control, he can control how he reacts to the variety of things that take place around him. Taking the same example of John, if he is determined not to be inclined towards stealing and has a good sense of control over himself he can still be friends with those people without it interfering with the values he was brought up with. Moreover, the child who was traumatized by his father's behavior would take it as a lesson to now walk in the footsteps of his father but take steps that would gain him a healthy relationship with his spouse.

People's behavior are without a doubt affects by factors that a person can not control by themselves. But how a person takes up these challenges depends entirely on whether he turns it into a positive outcome or a negative one.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-20 jason123 16 view
2020-01-16 AC1990 54 view
2020-01-15 stevewang1007 50 view
2020-01-13 jason123 16 view
2020-01-03 Navjot-kaur 54 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user MallikaS :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...s a group of thieves, it is very likely that that he too will be swayed towards stealing ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ouse which is prone to domestic violence towards the mother by the father, the ch...
^^
Line 5, column 496, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...her portrays is correct an ill-treating ones spouse is natural. This dogma can affec...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, still, well, kind of, as well as, in the first place, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1962.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 430.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56279069767 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61983118039 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486046511628 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2554401078 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.093223872683 0.243740707755 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0330258990673 0.0831039109588 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0253070754599 0.0758088955206 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0611333427592 0.150359130593 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0184386678029 0.0667264976115 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 12.1639044944 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.