As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
he prompt argues that, as people rely more and more on technology to solve their problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will deteriorate. I mostly disagree with this position stated by the author for the following reasons which I will elucidate further. Nevertheless, I do concede that in some situations human thinking is surely affected due to the technology.
To begin with, who has created technology? Humans themselves right. Humans introduces technologies to reduce their work and make life easier. If humans themselves have created technologies to make life easier, they obviously know what are the ill effects of it. For example a 'Mobile Phone' if mobiles were not introduced by humans years ago, could we imagine to live the same life that we live right now. No, we would have not been connected to each other, the development that we have seen would not be possible.
At the same time, we need technology in our day to day life it is not possible of us in this generation, to completely deploy technology out of our lives. Each and every field like media, science, industry, education, etc are dependent on technology. For instance, we can not run a industry producing canned beans without using the technical machines used in the factories. Technology is the need for our future and it must be used properly for sustainable growth of human race. And proper use of technology does not hamper the the human ability to think for themselves.
Just like they say every coin has two sides, the passage stated here has a other side as well. Relying more and more on technology in our daily lives has introduced lethargy in our life. Even to do the simplest things in our daily life we use technology. For instance, to switch on the fan nowadays we use remotes and senses like 'a clap'. In this particular case, we could surely move and switch on the fan on our own yet, we use a remote for the simplest work. This is making us more and more lazy. Our lazyness do affect us mentally and this sluggishness is not letting us think for ourselves.
In conclusion, "lose some and gain some" is a true principle. same goes with the prompt stated above by the author technology making our life easier may also have some ill-effects.
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 50
- The following recommendation was made by the president and administrative staff of Grove College a private institution to the college s governing committee Recently there have been discussions about ending Grove College s century old tradition of all fema 64
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasonin 58
- In most professions and academic fields imagination is more important than knowledge 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
he prompt argues that, as people rely more...
^^
Line 2, column 350, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'imagine living'.
Suggestion: imagine living
...ntroduced by humans years ago, could we imagine to live the same life that we live right now. N...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...echnology. For instance, we can not run a industry producing canned beans without...
^
Line 3, column 524, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...roper use of technology does not hamper the the human ability to think for themselves. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 524, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...roper use of technology does not hamper the the human ability to think for themselves. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 74, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... two sides, the passage stated here has a other side as well. Relying more and mo...
^
Line 5, column 72, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Same
...nd gain some' is a true principle. same goes with the prompt stated above by th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, nevertheless, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1864.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 393.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74300254453 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65811372397 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511450381679 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3765818993 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.0434782609 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0869565217 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08695652174 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218373548791 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747158706885 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788782225135 0.0758088955206 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139736717851 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117267802074 0.0667264976115 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 14.1392134831 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.