As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate
Technology has been an essential part of human life since the evolution and holds a strong role in development. The first time fire was discovered to a light bulb, a telephone till smart phones and applications today are all considered technology and shows growth and advancement of application of science and human ability. The authors concern on growing technology will detoriate humans capacity to think is surely one way to look at it considering how lives have become easier right now compared to olden times with the help but it surely will never affect a person’s ability to think.
If we look back in the previous century there has been advancements in fields of medicine, engineering, accounting, teaching, etc via technology. The coronavirus pandemic is a great example that shows how growing technology has reached almost each and every however big or small fields. It has got many people from different fields and industries keep going despite the restrictions and lockdown. Technology has helped thrive businesses, communication gap and even give rise to more industries.
Considering a basic instance of a Computer. A computer was developed purely to help humans in huge calculations. But from there on it started being used for storing data, collecting data, creating a thing called ‘internet’. It gave rise to a field called as ‘Digital’ which means things revolving around the internet as that’s how one field today has given birth to many big companies. Another important aspect is that it has created more educational fields, job opportunities, employment. It has brought world closer, it has made human interactions better and is soon proceeding towards human and machine interaction.
It is debateable on cons of technology and whether to consider it a boon or bane. In order to conclude in support of my stance; all the inventions are made with a purpose of betterment. How to use, wisely or destructively is in the hands of an individual. But one thing is sure that it hasn’t reduced or will ever reduce a persons ability to think.
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 73
- Manned space flight is costly and dangerous Moreover the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men an 52
- There are many different types of music in the world today Why do we need music Is the traditional music of a country more important than the International music that is heard everywhere nowadays 84
- A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer 50
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nting, teaching, etc via technology. The coronavirus pandemic is a great example ...
^^
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it has created more educational fields, job opportunities, employment. It has br...
^^
Line 4, column 324, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...it hasn’t reduced or will ever reduce a persons ability to think.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 340.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02344357855 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602941176471 0.4932671777 122% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8949471361 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.94117647059 5.21951772744 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232448773125 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570637285548 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586310941482 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122698503876 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442963819709 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.5 11.8971910112 181% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.