As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
The view says as technologies rapidly develop, people will lose their thinking abilities. This assertion is somewhat true since some basic thinking has indeed decreased. However, I believe core intellectual abilities such as a learning ability and reasoning skills are enhanced even faster, and we should conclude advanced technoloies improve our thinking power.
Thiking abilities related to simple repeatition seems to be really deteriorated nowadays. This is because people do not need to use those abilities any more in daily life. At work, employees use not only calender softwares to consider all of company schedules, but also computers to save contacts of companies for which they work. Furthermore, people usually leverage Excel to manage thier financial status. While cocking, no housewife and househusband memorize all recipes since they can search them anytime they want. This is, people fully exploit technoloies to handle basic and simple tasks, in above cases, like calculating and memorizing. This truly causes decreasing human’s abilities of those kinds.
Howeve, is this mean that all of intellectual abilities has been ebbed? I believe it is not true and thinking power has risen at this techology period. Take into account the learning ability first. As technologies has developed, human need to learn more and more to cover these technologies. In elementary school, students should learn algorithms and skills to use a computer like Excel and Powerpoint. Moreover, social science departments require to their students to study coding mandatory, which is never happend 5 year ago. Workers’ situation is the same; they have to spend their time to learn new technologies such as AI.
More powerful reasoning abilities are also required in this high technology society due to hyper connections emegerd by advanced communication and transport. When a typon occur in South America, the price of fruit in Japan would surge, and if an earthquake hit Tiwan, the factories of Samsung in Korea might have to halt at a moment. Hence, workers who are responsible for a supply management have to consider other nations status. Like this, governments also face more difficult situation. Even simple changes in their policies could make severe effect on other counties, and, of course, themselves. Therefore, comtemporary people need to have much more thinking power to solve problems in this globally connected societies which come from advanced technologies.
To sum up, I believe the development of technologies accelerates that of our thinking abilities. Thus, it is time to think how to increase intellectual abilities faster, not to concern decreased human abilities by technologies, which might never happen.
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places 66
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 50
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household 66
- In any profession business politics education government those in power should step down after five years 16
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: CALENDER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'calendar', a system of organizing days? A 'calender' is a machine.
Suggestion: calendar
...y life. At work, employees use not only calender softwares to consider all of company sc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 417, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...upply management have to consider other nations status. Like this, governments also fac...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, really, so, therefore, thus, while, of course, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2316.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 423.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47517730496 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87971210606 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595744680851 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 733.5 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2943128937 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.64 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.92 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291142894807 0.243740707755 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751108525849 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692296348558 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158563456619 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0122907285016 0.0667264976115 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.