People should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and
explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should
consider the reasons for which the statement may or may not be true and explain how these considerations
shape your position.
People should question the rules of authority rather than agreeing to them quietly, but they shouldn’t question everything there are something that require unquestionable acceptance and people need to understand this distinction.
One the prime examples of not questioning authorities gone wrong can be seen in allowing governments to implement rules without any kind of feedback. The whole mark of democracy is that the people are able to question the government’s actions and hold them accountable for it. This accountability helps the nation to understand what more important for their country. Thus, people should question the rules of authority rather than agreeing to them quietly, but they shouldn’t question everything there are something that require unquestionable acceptance and people need to understand this distinction.
Pakistan is a state security nation and a large chunk of the GDP is designated for defense forces, all the while the health care and educational infrastructure keeps on deteriorating. We as a nation are responsible for this because we have allowed them to make such policies without doing as much as raising a finger against it. There haven’t been any wars in Pakistan since the 1970’s but still we spent billions and billions of rupees on our militaries and defense equipments. If we or our forefathers have ever questioned this policy, we as a nation would have been far ahead in technology, healthcare and education. If we had the questioned the motives of the government we would be living in a social security nation rather than a state security nation. Negligence form the people give total power the rules which leads to disruption in the society.
But, questioning every move of the authorities is also a narrow minded approach; there are many things that are misunderstood by the common people. Such as diplomatic ties, trade and economic issues, these are the things that must be left for the experts to decide and carryout.
Questioning should be for the sake of improvement rather than criticism, and before we start to question something we need to ask ourselves a few questions like; Have I understood the problem completely? Do I possess the necessary knowledge to talk over the set issue? Would raising a question solve the issues? Only after we have answered all these questions in the affirmative, we can go ahead and question the rules and policies set by the authorities.
- People should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and 66
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and suppor 66
- If two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified the job should go to the applicant with more experience Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the posit 63
- Creativity should be used as the only true measure of intelligence Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling reasons and 49
- People should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 621, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n technology, healthcare and education. If we had the questioned the motives of th...
^^
Line 5, column 771, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[4]
Message: Did you mean 'from'?
Suggestion: from
...han a state security nation. Negligence form the people give total power the rules w...
^^^^
Line 5, column 771, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'forms'.
Suggestion: forms
...han a state security nation. Negligence form the people give total power the rules w...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, thus, while, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2054.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 395.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99575729473 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491139240506 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8803467813 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.823529412 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2352941176 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.23529411765 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171285368742 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617761650576 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577051786287 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114490898035 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617365228027 0.0667264976115 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.