People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it.
People always do have very different meanings about certain topics. Those meanings are based on ideas of how a situation could be as a result of an idea or policy. However, being deeply committed to an idea or policy does not automatically mean that this is a result of critical thinking.
People who are very committed to an idea should not directly be very critical about it. There are a lot of situations where people are very committed to an idea without having personal grounds, because of this a critical view could be wanting. As an example, people who grew up in a religious environment, with values of the religious community, continue with those values without have a personal interest about it. They purely continue this values because they get used to it.
People can also get involved in a situation who aggressively influenced their opinion. This situation has had a decent emotional impact which suppresses rational thinking. For example, citizens which are involved in robbery may supporting ideas of heavy punishments or high fines for delinquents of robbery without knowing anything about research about the added value of heavy punishments or higher fines. They also do not know anything about laws which restricted judges to judge very severe or about the increased costs for society by tolerating heavy punishments.
Another example is the example about politicians. All the politicians are well known about topics but this does not automatically mean that there a very critical. Often politicians refuse to look in another way the the same problem. They undermine other good arguments because they are eager to win a debat. Also, in this case, knowing a lot does not mean that you are critical.
After all, It is likely to say that people who are deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it. People could be influenced very much besides their own rational thinking, there could be life events in the past or simply the fact that they know a lot about a subject but refuse to be critical about it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | Himanshu Sharma | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | Himanshu Sharma | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | Himanshu Sharma | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | jha | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | NobodyUp | 66 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette."On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involv 50
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a Batavia newspaper."The department of agriculture in Batavia reports that the number of dairy farms throughout the country is now 25 percent greater than it was 10 years ago. During this same time perio 50
- The following appeared on the Mozart School of Music Web site The Mozart School of Music should be the first choice for parents considering enrolling their child in music lessons First of all the Mozart School welcomes youngsters at all ability and age le 73
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 50
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants."Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had little im 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
..., because of this a critical view could be wanting. As an example, people who grew up in a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...liticians refuse to look in another way the the same problem. They undermine other good...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...liticians refuse to look in another way the the same problem. They undermine other good...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, look, may, so, well, after all, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1712.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 348.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91954022989 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61182079673 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 215.323595506 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456896551724 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.0 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.2339104524 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1111111111 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94444444444 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331966970898 0.243740707755 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119381536319 0.0831039109588 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.176414281715 0.0758088955206 233% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197380486305 0.150359130593 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140072799314 0.0667264976115 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.